NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal — Procedural Compliance Affirmed. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons to condone a 13-day delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal under the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application concerning the extension of time for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by The Indure Pvt. Ltd. against B.K. Coal Fields Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19.07.2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 01.08.2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellant. Subsequently, the Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 21.08.2026. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellant presented arguments regarding the necessity of condoning the delay. The Tribunal considered the submissions and the reasons outlined in the Interlocutory Application, determining them to be sufficient. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed under the Companies Act. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the delay is condoned and the case is to be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing
  • defects in appeal
  • procedural compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 116

Interlocutory Application No.6272/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-07

Raj Kumar

Raghav Marwaha

The Indure Pvt. Ltd.

B.K. Coal Fields Pvt. Ltd., through its Liquidator (Formerly Resolution Professional), Arun Ganjwani & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the condonation of delay in procedural compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19.07.2026, defects were intimated on 01.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 21.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Registered Exporters' Challenge to Coffee Board's Circular on Sales Tax Exemption. The court affirmed that Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act is constitutionally valid and clarifies the conditions for tax exemption on pen...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Election Petition Case — Ensures Proper Notice for Corrupt Practice Allegations. The court emphasized the necessity of specific charges in election petitions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.