NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 13 Days in Re-filing Condoned as Justified Under Procedural Norms.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by The Indure Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19th July 2026, and upon scrutiny, the Office notified the Appellant of defects on 1st August 2026. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 21st August 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. The Tribunal considered the reasons provided in the application to be sufficient and condoned the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and the application was disposed of accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 115

Interlocutory Application No.6272/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-07

Raj Kumar

Raghav Marwaha

The Indure Pvt. Ltd.

B.K. Coal Fields Pvt. Ltd., through its Liquidator, Arun Ganjwani & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 13 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 19.07.2026, defects were intimated on 01.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 21.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Union of India's Appeal in Service Law Case — Seniority Not Granted for Ad Hoc Service. Citing that seniority must be counted from the date of regular appointment, not ad hoc service.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Dowry Death While Setting Aside Abetment of Suicide Charge. Conviction under Section 304B IPC confirmed due to established cruelty and harassment for dowry, while conviction under Section 306 IPC set aside due to ...