NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 2 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned as Justified Under Procedural Norms.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellants, Rohit Motawat and another, against the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. The Appellants e-filed their Memo of Appeal on 31st July 2026, but upon scrutiny on 18th August 2026, the Office identified certain defects and notified the Appellants. The Appellants subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 27th August 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellants' counsel and reviewed the averments in the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided for the delay sufficient and condoned the 2-day delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case, thereby disposing of the Interlocutory Application.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellants sought an extension of time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal, which was initially filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 2 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and the application was disposed of accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 2 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 114

Interlocutory Application No.6241/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-07

Raj Kumar

Milan Singh Negi

Rohit Motawat and Anr.

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay, justifying the condonation under procedural norms.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 02 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellants e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 31.07.2026, defects were intimated on 18.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 27.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010319492023_1
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Cross Appeals in Industrial Bonus Calculation Dispute. Full Bench Formula Applied to Compute Available Surplus; Political Fund Donations Not Deductible and Commission-Based Salesmen and Apprentices Excluded from Bonus Under In...