NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 02 Days Justified, Allowing Case to Proceed for Admission.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellants against the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. The Appellants initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 31.07.2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 18.08.2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellants. The Appellants subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 27.08.2026. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellants presented submissions regarding the delay in re-filing. The Tribunal considered the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application and found them sufficient to justify the delay of 02 days. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellants sought to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal due to a delay of 02 days in re-filing. The Tribunal found the reasons provided sufficient and condoned the delay, allowing the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and the application was disposed of accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 02 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 113

Interlocutory Application No.6241/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-07

Raj Kumar

Milan Singh Negi

Rohit Motawat and Anr.

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal

Issues

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellants provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 02 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellants e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 31.07.2026, defects were intimated on 18.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 27.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement. Parties Filed Consent Terms Before Family Court, Complainant Filed Affidavit Confirming No Objection, Leading to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498A, 406...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Setting Aside Magistrate's Direction for Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC. The Court Held That the Magistrate's Power to Order Investigation Is Not Barred by P...