NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal — Extension granted for curing defects in electronic filing. Delay of three days in re-filing Memo of Appeal condoned based on sufficient reasons provided.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal. The Appellant, Srei Equipment Finance Ltd., initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 30th July 2026. Upon scrutiny, the Office identified defects and notified the Appellant on 14th August 2026. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 24th August 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. Considering the reasons provided in the application, the Tribunal found them sufficient to justify the delay of three days in re-filing. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay and directed that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Not mentioned - The Appellant sought an extension for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient and condoned the delay of 3 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the case should be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 3 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 109

Interlocutory Application No.6237/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-07

Raj Kumar

Hriday Shah

Srei Equipment Finance Ltd.

Revi Sethia, Resolution Professional, Wind World (India) Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, warranting its condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 03 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 30.07.2026, defects were intimated on 14.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 24.08.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by KIADB in Winding Up Matter, Holding That Leasehold Rights Cannot Be Sold Without Conveyance of Title. The Court set aside the auction sale of land by the Official Liquidator as the lease cum sale deed had not ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Development Agreement Held Chargeable Under Article 5(ga) at 1% of Consideration, Not Market Value.