NCLAT Allows Extension for Curing Defects in Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of One Day in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned, Allowing Case to Proceed.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Sumit Sharma, against the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 21 July 2026. After scrutiny, the Office communicated the defects to the Appellant on 17 August 2026. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 25 August 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the averments in the Interlocutory Application as well as the Office report. The Tribunal considered the reasons provided in the application to be sufficient and decided to condone the delay of one day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench under the heading ‘for admission (fresh case)’. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought an extension of time to cure defects in the Memo of Appeal filed with the Tribunal. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient and condoned the delay of one day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, allowing the case to be listed for admission (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of one day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 108

Interlocutory Application No.6218/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-03

Raj Kumar

Ajitesh Kumar

Sumit Sharma

Registrar of Companies, Kolkata

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time to cure defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, warranting its condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 01 day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 21.07.2026, defects were intimated on 17.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 25.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considered Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Land Acquisition Amendment for Bullet Train Project. Petition Raised Questions of Repugnancy Under Article 254, Presidential Assent, Natural Justice, and Scope of Section 33 of the ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award on Interim Increment and Bonus for Workmen in Industrial Dispute. Interim Consent Award for 4% Increment Cannot Be Challenged; Piece-Rate Workers Not Entitled to Annual Increments; Unpaid Rent Used as Working ...