NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal — Delay of one day in re-filing Memo of Appeal was condoned based on sufficient reasons provided. The Tribunal found the reasons in the Interlocutory Application adequate to justify the delay.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application concerning the extension of time for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Sumit Sharma, against the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata. The Appellant had e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 21st July 2026, but upon scrutiny on 17th August 2026, the Office identified certain defects and notified the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 25th August 2026. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellant presented arguments regarding the necessity of condoning the delay. The Tribunal considered the submissions and the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application, determining them to be sufficient. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay of one day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal, which was initially filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of one day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was condoned (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of one day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 107

Interlocutory Application No.6218/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-03

Raj Kumar

Ajitesh Kumar

Sumit Sharma

Registrar of Companies, Kolkata

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal filed electronically.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 01 day in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 21.07.2026, defects were intimated on 17.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 25.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Confirms Death Penalty for Two Accused in Kidnapping-Murder Case Relying on Circumstantial Evidence. Extra-Judicial Confession and Discovery of Buried Body Established Chain of Events Under Section 34 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Addition of Wife and Son as Defendants in Declaratory Suit Concerning Marital Status. Court Rules That Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC Permits Addition of Parties with Potential Interest in Controversy to Effectually Adjudicate Marriage ...