NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal — Sufficient Reasons Established. Delay of 21 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Based on Justifiable Reasons Presented.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application by DMP Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. seeking to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal. The Appellant had initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 09.07.2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 24.07.2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellant. Subsequently, the Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 21.08.2026. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellant presented submissions regarding the reasons for the delay. The Tribunal considered these submissions and found them sufficient to justify the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay and ordered that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and condoned (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 99

Interlocutory Application No.6170/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-02

Raj Kumar

Shivalika Rudrabatla, Adhishwar Suri

DMP Vanijya Pvt. Ltd.

Williamson Magor & Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 09.07.2026, defects were intimated on 24.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 21.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Minor Inam Status of Land in Tamil Nadu — Clarifies Definitions Under Relevant Acts
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Railway Administration's Staffing Policy — No Discrimination Found. Railway Board's authority to classify cadres upheld under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.