NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 28 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Based on Appellant's Submissions.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Vijay Shobhalal Shah, against Hi-Tech Water Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd and others. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 25.06.2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 13.07.2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellant. Subsequently, the Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 17.08.2026. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellant presented submissions regarding the delay and the reasons for seeking an extension. The Tribunal considered these submissions and found them sufficient to justify the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay and directed that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Not mentioned - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient and condoned the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the case should be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 96

Interlocutory Application No.6116/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-02

Raj Kumar

Arjun Sheth, Hetvi Ganatra

Vijay Shobhalal Shah

Hi-Tech Water Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel argued for sufficient reasons to condone the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 25.06.2026, defects were intimated on 13.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 17.08.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Confirms Death Penalty for Two Accused in Kidnapping-Murder Case Relying on Circumstantial Evidence. Extra-Judicial Confession and Discovery of Buried Body Established Chain of Events Under Section 34 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Addition of Wife and Son as Defendants in Declaratory Suit Concerning Marital Status. Court Rules That Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC Permits Addition of Parties with Potential Interest in Controversy to Effectually Adjudicate Marriage ...