National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Condones Delay in Appeal Filing. Delay of 28 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Based on Sufficient Reasons Provided in the Application.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal. The Appellant, Vijay Shobhalal Shah, had e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 25.06.2026. Upon scrutiny, the Office identified defects on 13.07.2026 and communicated these to the Appellant. Subsequently, the Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 17.08.2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the averments in the Interlocutory Application as well as the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided for the delay to be sufficient and decided to condone the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench under the heading ‘for admission (fresh case)’. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Not applicable - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient and condoned the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the case should be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 95

Interlocutory Application No.6116/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-02

Raj Kumar

Arjun Sheth, Hetvi Ganatra

Vijay Shobhalal Shah

Hi-Tech Water Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the Appellant submitted reasons for the delay were sufficient.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal exercised its discretion to condone the delay based on sufficient reasons provided by the Appellant.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 28 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 25.06.2026, defects were intimated on 13.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 17.08.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Reinstatement in Employment Case — Quashes Termination Due to Lack of Inquiry. The court found that the termination was not in accordance with the principles of natural justice, necessitating reinstatement of the app...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan he...