NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn Due to Prior Dismissal by NCLT. Appellant Granted Permission to Withdraw Appeal Following Dismissal of Petition Under Section 7 of IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved Empire Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd. as the appellant and Ninaniya Estates Ltd. as the respondent. The appellant filed an application seeking permission to withdraw Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1416 of 2026 after the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissed their petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), allowing the appellant the liberty to pursue an alternative remedy. The tribunal considered the application and granted permission for withdrawal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. Additionally, the tribunal disposed of pending applications IA No. 5499 of 2026 and IA No. 5438 of 2026. The decision was made by Justice Yogesh Khanna, officiating chairperson, along with members Barun Mitra and Ajai Das Mehrotra.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Withdrawal of Appeal - Permission to Withdraw Appeal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal after the NCLT dismissed the petition with liberty to pursue an alternative remedy. The tribunal granted permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, also disposing of pending applications. Held that the appellant was entitled to withdraw the appeal (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant could withdraw the appeal after dismissal of the petition under Section 7 of the IBC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The tribunal granted permission to withdraw the appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn, also disposing of pending applications IA No. 5499 of 2026 and IA No. 5438 of 2026.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Alternative remedy under IBC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 88

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1416 of 2026

2026-09-07

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Empire Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Ninaniya Estates Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of petition under IBC.

Remedy Sought

Permission to withdraw the appeal.

Filing Reason

Petition under Section 7 of the IBC was dismissed by NCLT.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the petition with liberty to pursue an alternative remedy.

Issues

Whether the appellant could withdraw the appeal after dismissal of the petition under Section 7 of the IBC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal after NCLT dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was entitled to withdraw the appeal following the dismissal of the petition under Section 7 of the IBC.

Judgment Excerpts

This Application is seeking permission to withdraw Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1416 of 2026. Permission is granted and Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a petition under Section 7 of the IBC, which was dismissed by the NCLT, allowing for an alternative remedy. The appellant subsequently filed an application to withdraw the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty of Wife in Dowry-Related Case. Circumstantial Evidence of Demand for Money and Death by Poisoning Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Arbitrator's Failure to Disclose Conflict of Interest. Arbitrator's prior role as counsel for a party in another case raised justifiable doubts about impartiality under Section 12 of the Arbitrat...