National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Delay Condonation Applications in Insolvency Appeals Due to Non-compliance with Limitation Period. The court ruled that the limitation period for appeals under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two appeals filed by individual home buyers against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 18 November 2025, which dismissed their application as premature. The appellants sought to condone a delay of 40 days in filing their appeals, claiming that the delay was due to the late communication of the NCLT's order and the closure of their counsel's office during the holiday season. The court noted that the limitation period for filing the appeal was 30 days from the date of pronouncement of the order, which expired on 18 December 2025. The appellants filed their appeals on 3 February 2026, which was beyond the stipulated period. The court emphasized that the limitation period starts from the date the order is pronounced in open court, and not from the date it is uploaded online. The court referred to precedents that established the principle that the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the order could only be excluded if the application for the copy was made within the limitation period. The appellants did not apply for a certified copy in a timely manner, which contributed to the dismissal of their applications to condone the delay. Ultimately, the court dismissed both the delay condonation applications and the appeals due to the failure to comply with the statutory time limits set forth in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Delay Condonation - Limitation Period for Appeals - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The court held that the limitation period for filing appeals under Section 61(2) starts from the date of pronouncement of the order, not from the date of uploading. The appellants failed to demonstrate due diligence in securing a certified copy of the order, leading to the dismissal of their delay condonation applications (Paras 17-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the appeals against the impugned order could be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the delay condonation applications and the appeals, stating that the appeals were filed beyond the stipulated time limits set by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Law Points

  • Limitation period
  • delay condonation
  • insolvency appeals
  • pronouncement of order
  • certified copy requirement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 68

CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1458 of 2026, CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1459 of 2026

2026-09-02

Justice Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Nipun Gautam, Mr. Darpan Jain, Ms. Komal Abroi

Rajiv Ranjan Sharma & Anr., Kiran Hariraj Vishwakarma & Anr.

Vikas Gopichand Khiyani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against the dismissal of an application by the NCLT.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing appeals.

Filing Reason

Delay due to late communication of the order and office closure during holidays.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT dismissed the application as premature.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeals could be condoned. When does the limitation period start for appeals under the IBC?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the delay was not intentional and was due to circumstances beyond their control. The court emphasized the importance of timely filing and the requirement to secure a certified copy.

Ratio Decidendi

The limitation period for filing appeals under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order, and the court has no jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the statutory limits.

Judgment Excerpts

The limitation period for filing the appeal i.e. 45 days, expired on 23 January 2026. The impugned orders were pronounced in the court. The appeals were filed on 3 February 2026, beyond the stipulated 45 days. The above applications moved by the appellant to condone the delay of 45 days appears to be not maintainable and are dismissed as such.

Procedural History

The appellants filed delay condonation applications in both appeals after the NCLT's order dated 18 November 2025 was passed. The appeals were filed on 3 February 2026, leading to the current proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 12
  • NCLAT Rules, 2016: Rule 3, Rule 22(2), Rule 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellants' Challenge in Pension Dispute Case — Clarifies Pensionary Benefits for Absorbed Employees.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Corporate Summons Service Case — Validity of Service on Non-Authorized Personnel Questioned. The court found that service on a mere office assistant did not meet the requirements of valid service under the Code of Civ...