NCLAT Dismisses Appeal for Delay in Filing Beyond Statutory Limitations. The court emphasized the strict adherence to timelines under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the necessity of obtaining a certified copy for appeal.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by the appellant against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated April 17, 2026. The appellant sought to condone a delay of 43 days in filing the appeal, claiming that he was not promptly informed of the order by his previous counsel. Upon learning of the order, the appellant acted diligently to obtain a certified copy and file the appeal. However, the respondent contended that the appeal was filed beyond the 45-day limit for condonation and that the NCLAT lacked jurisdiction to condone such delay. The court noted that the limitation period commenced on April 18, 2026, and the appeal was e-filed on June 29, 2026, thus exceeding the allowable period. The court referenced the Supreme Court's rulings regarding the strict nature of limitation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the necessity of obtaining a certified copy for filing an appeal. It concluded that the appellant failed to demonstrate due diligence in applying for the certified copy within the stipulated time frame, leading to the dismissal of both the delay condonation application and the appeal itself. The judgment underscored the critical nature of adhering to statutory timelines in insolvency proceedings to ensure efficiency and certainty in the resolution process.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Limitation Period - Condonation of Delay - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The appeal was filed 43 days late, beyond the permissible period for condonation. The court held that the delay was not maintainable as it exceeded the statutory limits set by the IBC, emphasizing the importance of timely action in insolvency proceedings (Paras 16-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned and the implications of the requirement for a certified copy under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application to condone the delay of 43 days was dismissed as not maintainable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as well.

Law Points

  • Limitation period
  • condonation of delay
  • certified copy requirement
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 64

CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1324 of 2026 & IA No. 517 4 of 2026

2026-09-02

Justice Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Manoj Munshi, Mr. Jatin Sehagal, Mr. Mayank Munshi, Mr. RP Agrawal, Ms. Reema Mishra

Keshav Kumar Nachani

Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the NCLT regarding insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Filing Reason

Delay in being informed of the NCLT order and subsequent steps taken to file the appeal.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT order was pronounced on April 17, 2026, and the appeal was filed on June 29, 2026.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned Implications of the requirement for a certified copy under the IBC

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the delay was due to not being informed promptly and acted diligently thereafter. The respondent contended that the appeal was filed beyond the permissible period for condonation and the NCLAT lacked jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the strict adherence to statutory timelines under the IBC and the necessity of obtaining a certified copy for filing an appeal, stating that delays beyond the prescribed limits cannot be condoned.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal has been filed after 43 days (beyond the 45 days) within which the delay may be condoned by this Appellate Tribunal. The IBC is a complete code in itself and overrides any inconsistencies that may arise in the application of other laws.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT order dated April 17, 2026, with a delay of 43 days, leading to the application for condonation of delay.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking to Treat Oral Dictation as Final Order — Signed Order Prevails Over Dictation in Open Court. The Court held that the signed order uploaded on 12.02.2026 is the binding order, not the oral dictation, and t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Full Bench Answers Reference on Entitlement of Second Wife to Family Pension under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court examines Rule 116(6)(a)(i) in light of Hindu Marriage Act and personal laws.