National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appellant in Insolvency Case — Precondition on Losses Set Aside. Tribunal Expunges Directive on Loss Adjustment, Upholding Appellant's Right to Claim Carry Forward Losses Under Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by the Appellant against an order from the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, which ruled on the treatment of accumulated losses following the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Appellant contested Paragraph 9.4 of the impugned order, which mandated that accumulated losses must first be set off against a Capital/General Reserve before any claims could be made under the Income Tax Act. The Appellant argued that this directive violated established jurisprudence, specifically referencing a prior case where the Tribunal had affirmed the right to carry forward losses without such restrictions. The Tribunal analyzed the implications of the Adjudicating Authority's order, noting that it effectively predetermined the outcome of claims under the Income Tax Act, which is governed by statutory provisions. The Tribunal emphasized that the Income Tax Department had full knowledge of the CIRP and had not raised objections during the proceedings, thus binding it to the outcome. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the conflicting directive in Paragraph 9.4, allowing the Appellant to pursue claims for carry forward losses independently. The appeal was disposed of with the expungement of the problematic paragraph, affirming the Appellant's statutory rights under the Income Tax Act.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Carry Forward of Losses - Statutory Rights - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 79 - The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority could not impose preconditions on the carry forward of losses that conflicted with the Income Tax Act, allowing the Appellant to claim benefits independently before the Income Tax Authority. (Paras 3-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Adjudicating Authority's directive regarding the adjustment of accumulated losses against Capital/General Reserve before claiming benefits under the Income Tax Act was legally valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, expunging Paragraph 9.4 of the impugned order and affirming the Appellant's right to claim carry forward losses under Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Insolvency
  • Income Tax
  • Carry Forward Losses
  • Jurisdictional Authority
  • Resolution Plan
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 62

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1313 of 2026 & I.A. No. 5118 of 2026

2026-09-29

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Ms. Eshna Kumar, Ms. Astha Agrawal, Mr. Sabari C., Ms. Muskan Abbasi, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Ridhima Mehrotra, Ms. Anurima Gupta

Rajesh Singla

Chairman, Implementation and Monitoring Committee Nexgen Laminators Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding treatment of accumulated losses post-CIRP.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to set aside the directive regarding the adjustment of accumulated losses.

Filing Reason

The Appellant argued that the directive violated established legal principles regarding carry forward of losses.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal had previously ruled on similar issues in related cases, affirming the right to carry forward losses.

Issues

Validity of the Adjudicating Authority's directive on loss adjustment Rights of the Appellant under the Income Tax Act

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant contended that the directive imposed by the Adjudicating Authority was inconsistent with established jurisprudence. The Respondent did not object to the delay in filing the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority could not impose conditions on the carry forward of losses that conflicted with statutory provisions, thereby preserving the Appellant's rights under the Income Tax Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay of 14 days stands condoned. The appeal is allowed with aforesaid observations. We set aside and expunge the observations and directives contained in Paragraph 9.4 of the Impugned Order.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order dated 11/05/2026 from the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, concerning the treatment of accumulated losses following the CIRP.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 79
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Housing Society in Plot Allotment Dispute Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Co-operative Court Has Jurisdiction Over Disputes Between Member and Society Touching Business of Societ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Upholds Tribunal's Award. The transferee company is bound by the proceedings of the transferor and cannot reopen proceedings without exceptional circumstances.