National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appellant to File Reply in Company Law Matter — Procedural Fairness Emphasized. Tribunal set aside the order closing the right to file a reply, emphasizing the need for a final opportunity in the interest of justice.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority in C.P.(IB)/1416(MB)2025, where the right of the Respondent to file a reply was closed. The Appellant, Vaibhav Mercantile Ltd., contended that it had appeared before the Adjudicating Authority for the first time on 17.03.2026 and was granted ten days to file a reply, which it failed to do due to unavoidable circumstances and lack of legal advice. The Appellant argued that it was contesting the matter diligently and requested additional time to file the reply. Conversely, the Respondent's counsel asserted that ample time had been provided and the Appellant's failure to file the reply was deliberate. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant had indeed appeared and was provided with the necessary documents but failed to file the reply within the granted time. However, considering that only one opportunity was given and the proceedings were still ongoing, the Tribunal decided to set aside the Impugned Order and grant the Appellant one last opportunity to file its reply within seven days. The Respondent was also allowed to file a rejoinder thereafter. The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Right to File Reply - Procedural Fairness - National Company Law Tribunal, 2016 - The Appellant's right to file a reply was closed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority due to non-filing within the stipulated time. The Tribunal held that since only one opportunity was granted and the proceedings were still pending, a final opportunity should be provided to the Appellant to file its reply (Paras 10-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the closure of the right to file a reply by the Learned Adjudicating Authority was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order and granted the Appellant one last opportunity to file its reply within seven days, with the Respondent allowed to file a rejoinder thereafter. The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Right to file reply
  • procedural fairness
  • opportunity to be heard
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 58

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1072 of 2026

2026-09-09

Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Ramji Srinivasan, Akshit Pradhan, Shefali Mande, Divyansh Agrawal, Aryansh Tripathi, G. Vairava Subramanian

Vaibhav Mercantile Ltd.

S. Kaliyammal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the closure of the right to file a reply in a company law matter.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to have the order closing its right to file a reply set aside.

Filing Reason

The Appellant claimed it could not file the reply due to unavoidable circumstances and lack of legal advice.

Previous Decisions

The Learned Adjudicating Authority had closed the right to file a reply due to non-filing within the stipulated time.

Issues

Closure of right to file reply Procedural fairness in adjudication

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for a final opportunity to file a reply citing unavoidable circumstances. Respondent contended that the Appellant had ample time and failed to file the reply deliberately.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard, allowing the Appellant a final opportunity to present its case.

Judgment Excerpts

The right of the Respondent (Appellant herein) to file reply has been closed. We are of the considered view that since only one opportunity was granted by the Learned Adjudicating Authority to the Respondent (Appellant) to file the reply. The Impugned Order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority is set aside.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Adjudicating Authority which closed its right to file a reply. The appeal was heard on 09.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • National Company Law Tribunal Act, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. High Court Misapplied Law on Non-Compoundable Offences Under Section 320 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reversion of Naval Sailor for Lack of Mandatory Qualification. Promotion to Acting Petty Officer Mechanical Engineer set aside as petitioner failed to possess Boiler-Room Watch Keeping Certificate requ...