NCLAT Allows Delay in Refiling Memo of Appeal Due to Counsel's Ailment. Delay of 21 Days Condoned Under NCLT Rules, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 18.07.2026, and upon scrutiny, the Office reported defects on 29.07.2026. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 26.08.2026. The Appellant's Counsel submitted that the application sought to condone a delay of 42 days in refiling; however, the actual delay was reported to be 21 days. The Registry confirmed this delay, and the Tribunal considered the reasons provided, including the ailment of the Counsel at the relevant time. The Tribunal allowed the application, condoning the delay and directing that the case be listed for admission. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with the order to list the case before the Hon’ble Bench.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Refiling - National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Rules, 2016 - The Appellant sought to condone a delay of 21 days in refiling the Memo of Appeal due to the ailment of Counsel. The Tribunal allowed the application and condoned the delay, permitting the case to be listed for admission (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in refiling the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the application and condoned the delay of 21 days in refiling the Memo of Appeal, directing that the case be listed for admission.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Refiling of appeal
  • Defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 38

Interlocutory Application No.6939/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-30

Raj Kumar

Aditi Saraswat

Satyawan Vasant Nagvekar

Mamta Binani, Resolution Professional and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in refiling the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Initial filing of Memo of Appeal had defects that needed curing.

Issues

Whether the delay in refiling the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the Appellant argued for condonation of delay due to ailment. Registry reported actual delay of 21 days instead of 42 days.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the reasons for delay, including the ailment of Counsel, in allowing the application for condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

The application is allowed and delay of 21 days in refiling the Memo of Appeal is condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 18.07.2026, defects were reported on 29.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 26.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • National Company Law Tribunal Rules:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Custody of Seized Bullocks to Animal Welfare Trust in Preference to Accused Owner Under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The court held that the welfare of animals is paramount and the trust, dedicated to animal we...
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Proceedings Due to Lack of Merit. Appeal Fails as No Violation of Natural Justice Established and Limitation Not Barred.