NCLAT Allows Delay in Refiling Memo of Appeal Due to Counsel's Ailment. Delay of 21 Days in Refiling Condoned Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal. The Appellant, Satyawan Vasant Nagvekar, initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 18.07.2026. Following scrutiny, the Office notified the Appellant of defects on 29.07.2026, leading to a re-filing of the Appeal on 26.08.2026. The Appellant's Counsel submitted that the application sought to condone a delay of 42 days; however, the actual delay reported was 21 days. The Registry confirmed this delay, attributing it to the Counsel's ailment at the relevant time. The Tribunal, upon reviewing the application and the Office report, allowed the request to condone the delay and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with the order to proceed with the appeal.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Refiling of Appeal - Companies Act, 2013 - The application sought to condone a delay of 21 days in refiling the Memo of Appeal due to the ailment of the Counsel. The Tribunal allowed the application and condoned the delay, directing the case to be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in refiling the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the application and condoned the delay of 21 days in refiling the Memo of Appeal, directing the case to be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Refiling of appeal
  • Defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 37

Interlocutory Application No.6939/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-30

Raj Kumar

Aditi Saraswat

Satyawan Vasant Nagvekar

Mamta Binani, Resolution Professional and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in refiling the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Whether the delay in refiling the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel argued for condonation of delay due to ailment. Registry confirmed the delay was 21 days.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances leading to the delay, particularly the ailment of the Counsel, in allowing the condonation of delay.

Judgment Excerpts

The application is allowed and delay of 21 days in refiling the Memo of Appeal is condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 18.07.2026, defects were intimated on 29.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 26.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Joint Hearing of Land Acquisition and Civil Suit. The court determined that two related cases should be heard together to promote judicial efficiency and coherence.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Attachment Warrant in NI Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Section 82 CrPC. Attachment order under Section 83 CrPC set aside as the Magistrate failed to record satisfaction that accused had absc...