NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 29 Days in Re-filing Condoned as Justified Based on Submissions Made.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal. The Appellant, Hemant Kumar Agarwal, e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 08.07.2026, but the Office identified defects on 29.07.2026 and notified the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 03.09.2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the averments in the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided for the delay of 29 days in re-filing to be sufficient and thus condoned the delay. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought an extension of time to cure defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 29 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and condoned (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 29 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 34

Interlocutory Application No.6791/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-22

Raj Kumar

Khushi Sharma

Hemant Kumar Agarwal

Satish Mittal & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 29 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 08.07.2026, defects were intimated on 29.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 03.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Joint Hearing of Land Acquisition and Civil Suit. The court determined that two related cases should be heard together to promote judicial efficiency and coherence.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Attachment Warrant in NI Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Section 82 CrPC. Attachment order under Section 83 CrPC set aside as the Magistrate failed to record satisfaction that accused had absc...