NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal — Sufficient Reasons Established for Delay. The Tribunal found the 21-day delay in re-filing justified based on the Appellant's submissions and directed the case to be listed for admission.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application by Phantom Studios India Pvt. Ltd. to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal against Eros International Media Ltd. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 15th July 2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 27th July 2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 24th August 2026. The Tribunal, after hearing the submissions from the Appellant's counsel and reviewing the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application, found the reasons sufficient to justify the delay of 21 days in re-filing. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay and ordered that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The order concluded with the disposal of the Interlocutory Application.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Re-filing - Not applicable - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed on 15.07.2026, which was scrutinized on 27.07.2026, leading to a re-filing on 24.08.2026. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons to condone the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed the case to be listed for admission.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • extension of time
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 31

Interlocutory Application No.6717/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-21

Raj Kumar

Sanithya Kumar

Phantom Studios India Pvt. Ltd.

Eros International Media Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 15.07.2026, defects were intimated on 27.07.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 24.08.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Custody of Seized Bullocks to Animal Welfare Trust in Preference to Accused Owner Under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The court held that the welfare of animals is paramount and the trust, dedicated to animal we...
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Proceedings Due to Lack of Merit. Appeal Fails as No Violation of Natural Justice Established and Limitation Not Barred.