NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 25 Days in Re-filing Condoned as Reasons Found Sufficient Under Procedural Norms.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Rajesh Kotian, against the Union of India and others. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 17th July 2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 6th August 2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 7th September 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the averments in the Interlocutory Application (IA) along with the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the IA to be sufficient and condoned the delay of 25 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed for admission under the heading of fresh cases, thereby disposing of the IA.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Tribunal considered the application for extending the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal and found the reasons sufficient to condone the delay of 25 days in re-filing. The court directed that the case be listed for admission under fresh cases (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 25 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission under fresh cases.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 30

Interlocutory Application No.6716/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-21

Raj Kumar

Gaurav Adusumalli

Rajesh Kotian

Union of India, M/o Corporate Affairs & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal

Issues

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant's counsel submitted reasons for the delay in re-filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 25 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 17.07.2026, defects were intimated on 06.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 07.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Due to Reliable Eye-Witness Testimony. Evidence Established Shared Common Intention Among Accused Under Section 34 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Cooperative Bank's Recovery Officer Against Auction Sale of Property. Sale by cooperative bank under MCS Act is not a sale under Transfer of Property Act, and recovery officer is not a court or tribunal un...