National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Condones Delay in Appeal Filing Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 09 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned as Justified Under Procedural Norms.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant. The Appellant, Nishkarsh Kumar, e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026. After scrutiny, the Office notified the Appellant of defects on 24.08.2026. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 09.09.2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the application sufficient to justify the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the case was ordered to be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought an extension of time to cure defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the delay was condoned and the case was to be listed for admission (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 26

Interlocutory Application No.6611/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-16

Raj Kumar

Tarun Mehta, Nitai Agarwal

Nishkarsh Kumar

Chaya Gupta & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects were identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant's counsel submitted reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, thus allowing the appeal to proceed.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026, defects were intimated on 24.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 09.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in IPC Conviction Case Due to Time Served. Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Under Sections 366 and 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction in Arbitration Matter — Jurisdiction Upheld Based on Business Presence.