NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 09 Days Justified for Condonation Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant. The Appellant, Nishkarsh Kumar, e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026, but the Office identified defects on 24.08.2026 and notified the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 09.09.2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions from the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the Interlocutory Application (IA) along with the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the IA to be sufficient and decided to condone the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading, thereby disposing of the IA.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons for the delay of 09 days and condoned it, allowing the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and the appeal could proceed (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 25

Interlocutory Application No.6611/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-16

Raj Kumar

Tarun Mehta, Nitai Agarwal

Nishkarsh Kumar

Chaya Gupta & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 09 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026, defects were intimated on 24.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 09.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.2,00,000 for Minor Pedestrian Injured by Maxi Cab. Negligence of Driver Established Through Criminal Proceedings and Tribunal's Findin...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against Bank Officials in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Dishonest Intent. Allegations of Criminal Conspiracy and Forgery Against Retired Bank Managers Dismissed as Civil Dispute ...