NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal — Sufficient Reasons Established. Delay of 12 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal. The Appellants, Sabar Singh Prabhakar and another, initially e-filed their Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026. Following scrutiny by the Office on 21.08.2026, defects were communicated to the Appellants on the same day. The Appellants subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 09.09.2026. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellants presented their submissions regarding the delay. The Tribunal considered the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application and found them sufficient to justify the delay. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the 12-day delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench for admission as a fresh case. The Interlocutory Application was disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellants sought to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal, which was initially filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided by the Appellants sufficient and condoned the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, allowing the case to proceed for admission (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission as a fresh case.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 24

Interlocutory Application No.6609/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-16

Raj Kumar

Tarun Mehta, Nitai Agarwal

Sabar Singh Prabhakar & Anr.

Chaya Gupta & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to extend the time for curing defects.

Filing Reason

Initial Memo of Appeal filed electronically with subsequent defects identified.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants provided reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided by the Appellants to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellants e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026, defects were intimated on 21.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 09.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction in Arbitration Matter — Jurisdiction Upheld Based on Business Presence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Partial Appeal in Criminal Case with Sentence Reduction. The court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already served based on the circumstances of the case.