NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 12 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned as Reasons Found Sufficient.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application to extend the time for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellants, Sabar Singh Prabhakar and another. The Appellants initially e-filed their Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 21.08.2026, they were informed of certain defects. Subsequently, the Appellants re-filed the Appeal on 09.09.2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Appellants and reviewed the averments in the Interlocutory Application as well as the Office report. The Tribunal found the reasons provided by the Appellants to be sufficient and decided to condone the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed before the Hon’ble Bench under the heading ‘for admission (fresh case)’. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal - Not applicable - The Appellants sought to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient to condone the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the delay was condoned and the case was to be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission (fresh case).

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 23

Interlocutory Application No.6609/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-16

Raj Kumar

Tarun Mehta, Nitai Agarwal

Sabar Singh Prabhakar & Anr.

Chaya Gupta & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application were sufficient to condone the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 12 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellants e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.08.2026, defects were intimated on 21.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 09.09.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction in Arbitration Matter — Jurisdiction Upheld Based on Business Presence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Partial Appeal in Criminal Case with Sentence Reduction. The court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already served based on the circumstances of the case.