NCLAT Allows Extension for Curing Defects in Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned, Enabling Further Proceedings.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority seeking to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal. The Appellant had initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 26.07.2026, but upon scrutiny on 12.08.2026, the Office identified defects and notified the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 03.09.2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application. It was determined that the reasons for the delay were sufficient, leading to the decision to condone the 15-day delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading, thereby facilitating the continuation of the appeal process.

Headnote

A) Procedural Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons for the delay of 15 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and condoned the delay, allowing the case to be listed for admission. Held that the delay was justified and necessary for proper adjudication (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 15 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 22

Interlocutory Application No.6530/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-15

Raj Kumar

U.N. Singh

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

Ram Phal Bhardwaj, Resolution Professional for ANS Apartment Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

The Appellant filed the Memo of Appeal but was notified of defects by the Office.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 15 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 26.07.2026, defects were intimated on 12.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 03.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction in Arbitration Matter — Jurisdiction Upheld Based on Business Presence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Partial Appeal in Criminal Case with Sentence Reduction. The court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already served based on the circumstances of the case.