NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing of Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 21 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned, Allowing Case to be Listed for Admission.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application by Sawalka Autotech Pvt. Ltd. to extend the time for curing defects in their Memo of Appeal. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 20.07.2026, but the Office identified defects on 03.08.2026 and notified the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 31.08.2026. During the hearing, the counsel for the Appellant presented submissions regarding the reasons for the delay. The Tribunal considered these submissions and found them sufficient to justify the 21-day delay in re-filing. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay and ordered that the case be listed for admission under the heading of 'fresh case'. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons for the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and condoned the delay, allowing the case to be listed for admission (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission under 'fresh case'.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 12

Interlocutory Application No.6356/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-09

Raj Kumar

Hargun Singh Kalra

Sawalka Autotech Pvt. Ltd.

Jalesh Kumar Grover, Resolution Professional for Grandstar Reality Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to extend time for curing defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Initial e-filing of the Memo of Appeal contained defects.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the Appellant submitted reasons for the delay in re-filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided to justify the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 20.07.2026, defects were intimated on 03.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 31.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Act Case Due to Standard Rent Determination. Actual Rent Cannot Exceed Standard Rent Under Section 23 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Extension Application Case Under Section 139(2) of Income Tax Act. Belated Application for Extension of Return Filing Time Held Valid Despite Expiry of Original Period as Proviso Contains No Limitation.