NCLAT Condones Delay in Appeal Filing Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 21 Days in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Condoned Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by Sawalka Autotech Pvt. Ltd. against Jalesh Kumar Grover, the Resolution Professional for Grandstar Reality Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant initially e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 20th July 2026, but upon scrutiny by the Office on 3rd August 2026, defects were identified and communicated to the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 31st August 2026. During the hearing, the counsel for the Appellant presented submissions regarding the delay, which the Tribunal found to be justified. Consequently, the Tribunal condoned the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading. The Interlocutory Application was thus disposed of with this order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to extend the time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found sufficient reasons for the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and condoned the delay, allowing the case to be listed for admission (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and directed that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 11

Interlocutory Application No.6356/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026

2026-09-09

Raj Kumar

Hargun Singh Kalra

Sawalka Autotech Pvt. Ltd.

Jalesh Kumar Grover, Resolution Professional for Grandstar Reality Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in Memo of Appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Initial Memo of Appeal filed electronically contained defects.

Previous Decisions

Defects were identified by the Office upon scrutiny.

Issues

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 21 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned. With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 20.07.2026, defects were intimated on 03.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 31.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction in Arbitration Matter — Jurisdiction Upheld Based on Business Presence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Partial Appeal in Criminal Case with Sentence Reduction. The court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already served based on the circumstances of the case.