High Court Allows Writ Petition for Expunging Adverse Remarks in APAR. The downgrading of the petitioner's grading in the APAR was found to be illogical and contrary to law, leading to the expunging of adverse remarks and granting of JAG under NFFU.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by a petitioner against the Union of India and various officials regarding the downgrading of his grading in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the period from 01.04.2016 to 14.09.2016. The petitioner, who joined the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) as a Direct Recruit Sub-Inspector in 1998 and was later promoted to Deputy Commandant, challenged the order dated 23.05.2018 that rejected his appeal to expunge adverse remarks made against him. The petitioner argued that his grading had been consistently 'Very Good' or 'Outstanding' except for the disputed period, and claimed that the downgrading was due to personal bias from a superior officer after he declined to perform a favor. The respondents contended that the petitioner failed to act against IPS probationers who disrespected the Academy song, which adversely affected his performance assessment. The court analyzed the reasons for downgrading and found them to be illogical, noting that the petitioner had been graded 'Outstanding' by the Reporting Officer during the same period. The court emphasized that the downgrading lacked justification and ordered the expunging of the adverse remarks, granting the petitioner the JAG under NFFU to receive pay equivalent to the rank of Second-in-Command. The writ petition was allowed with no costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Performance Appraisal - Downgrading of Grading - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court found the downgrading of the petitioner's grading in the APAR to be illogical and contrary to law, as it was based on an isolated incident without considering the petitioner's overall performance. The court ordered the expunging of the adverse remarks and directed the grant of Junior Administrative Grade (JAG) under Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU) (Paras 14-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the downgrading of the petitioner's grading in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, expunged the adverse remarks in the APAR, and directed the grant of Junior Administrative Grade (JAG) under Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU) to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • Annual Performance Appraisal Report
  • Non-Functional Financial Upgradation
  • Judicial Review
  • Public Servant Assessment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 322

WP No. 28128 of 2023

2026-09-15

C. Kumarappan

K. Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, B. Thirumalai, C. Kulanthaivel

Khan Salim Ahmed

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the downgrading of performance grading in APAR.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the adverse remarks and obtain JAG under NFFU.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed downgrading was due to personal bias and lacked justification.

Previous Decisions

The appeal to expunge the grading was rejected by the respondents.

Issues

Justification for downgrading in APAR Impact of personal bias on performance assessment

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the downgrading was illogical and based on personal bias. Respondents contended that the petitioner's failure to act against indiscipline warranted the downgrade.

Ratio Decidendi

The downgrading of performance grading in the APAR must be based on objective assessment and not personal grievances; the court emphasized the need for fair and dispassionate evaluations.

Judgment Excerpts

The court found the downgrading of the petitioner's grading in the APAR to be illogical and contrary to law. The very observations made against the petitioner... would indicate that the conclusion... was hyperbolic and illogical.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging the order dated 23.05.2018 regarding the APAR grading.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Liability Case — Liability Imposed on Appellant Set Aside. The court found that the driving license was valid and properly renewed, leading to the conclusion that the imposition of liability was unjustified.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Employee's Plea for Voluntary Retirement in MSRTC Medical Unfit Case by Quashing Denial Order. Medical Board Declared Assistant Traffic Superintendent Unfit for Duty, and Court Deemed Retirement from 1 November 2019, Directi...