High Court of Judicature at Madras Disposes Writ Petition for Appointment as Assistant Engineers Due to Fair Submission by Respondents. Petitioners to be Considered for Appointment as per Qualifications Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by a group of petitioners seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials to appoint them as Assistant Engineers (Industries) through recruitment by transfer. The petitioners contended that they were currently functioning as Assistants and had been overlooked for the position despite similar individuals being appointed under comparable circumstances. The learned Additional Advocate General representing the respondents initially objected but later conceded that the petitioners would be considered for the position, provided they met the necessary qualifications. Given this fair submission from the respondents, the court determined that a detailed examination of the case was unnecessary and thus disposed of the writ petition without costs. The judgment was delivered on 09-09-2026.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Writ of Mandamus - Direction for Appointment - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners sought appointment as Assistant Engineers (Industries) by recruitment by transfer, claiming similar treatment as others in the same position. The court noted the respondents' agreement to consider the petitioners for the post, thus disposing of the writ petition without further adjudication. Held that the matter was resolved by the respondents' fair submission (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to be considered for appointment as Assistant Engineers (Industries) by recruitment by transfer.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the writ petition based on the respondents' fair submission to consider the petitioners for appointment as Assistant Engineers (Industries) by recruitment by transfer, without costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Recruitment by Transfer
  • Consideration for Appointment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 321

WP No. 26555 of 2024

2026-09-09

C.Kumarappan

Mr. Rajeni Ramadass, Mr.J.Gowthaman, Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi, Mr.A.Prasanna Rajendiran, Mr.K.K.Senthil Velan

P.Meenakshi Lakshmi, A. Geetha, P. Girija, K.R.Prakash, S. Prem Kumar, S. Keerthika, R.Vijayakumar, R.Raja, M.Gandhimathi, B.Elango, G.Sarathkumar, E.Gowtham, N.Manimegalai, J.Kesavanathan, S.Sivaselvam, P.Nathikkumar, S.Gowtham, D.Gowtham, N.Mohanraj, K.Dinesh, G.Sabapath, G.Nagaraj, S.Sangar Ganeshan, L.Ramkumar, T.Sakthimurugan, P.Umaselvan, A.Jeevagan, S.Sivasubramaniyan, D.Srinivasan, K.Kohila, T.Mahadevi, S.Anusuya, B.Reachel Sweety, A.R.Siva Priya, R.Gayathri, S.Kaviraj, Mohammed Nawas Sheriff M.T

State of Tamil Nadu, The Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce, Sathiyamoorthy, Jeyakumar, Dharani, Malar, Pradeep, Vinoth Kumar, Gunasekaran, Dinesh Kumar, Ramesh, Dhanasekaran, Keerthika, Manoj, Rajesh, Sajith, Mathusoothanan, Bhuvaneswaran, Umarani, Bhuvaneswaran, Anish, Ajay Vigneswar, R.Kaviarasan, N.Manivannan, D.Dharun Kumar, S.Selvam, V.Rakshna, S.Salauddin, C.Anusuya, M.Prasannakumar, S.Kumaresan, R.Meenambika, Y.A.Ezhilazhagan, V.Manoj Krishkumar, M.Raja, A.Suganya, Kalidoss, Razia, Soundarya.K, Kesavan, N. Krishnamoorthy, Mani, Sivachandran, K. Sarath Kumar, G.Arunachalam, G.Dhanalakshmi, S.Bala Nandhini, M.Saravanan, S.Kodishwaran

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition seeking appointment as Assistant Engineers.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a Writ of Mandamus for appointment as Assistant Engineers.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were not considered for the post despite being similarly situated.

Issues

Entitlement to be considered for appointment as Assistant Engineers Fairness of the respondents' submission

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for consideration based on prior appointments of similarly situated individuals. Respondents agreed to consider the petitioners for the position subject to qualifications.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of fair consideration for appointment based on qualifications and prior practices.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the official respondents to appoint the petitioners as Assistant Engineers (Industries) by the method of recruitment by transfer. The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the official respondents... would submit that the first and second respondents would consider the petitioners as well as the private respondents for the post of Assistant Engineers (Industries), subject to the condition that they possess the requisite qualifications.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought to be appointed as Assistant Engineers (Industries) by recruitment by transfer. The respondents initially objected but later agreed to consider the petitioners.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Orissa Government Scheme for Sale of Kendu Leaves, Holding it Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights. Exclusive Right to Make Offers Given to Past Contractors Under Section 10 of Orissa Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Student's Petition in Scholarship Dispute — Directs College to Return Original Certificates. College's Unilateral Appropriation of Scholarship Amount and Withholding of Certificates Held Unjustified Under Article 226 ...