High Court Allows Writ Petition for Selection Grade in Service Matter — Reinstatement with Continuity of Service Affirmed. The court found that the denial of selection grade was inconsistent with applicable rules after the termination was set aside.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging an order dated 10.05.2024, issued by the Principal District Judge, Vellore, which denied the petitioner selection grade from the date of his appointment on 14.06.1999. The denial was based on the petitioner's previous termination due to alleged submission of a bogus certificate. However, the Appellate Authority had set aside the termination and reinstated the petitioner without backwages but with continuity of service and seniority. The respondents contended that since the petitioner was not granted backwages, the selection grade could not be extended from the date of initial appointment. The petitioner argued that the termination was set aside on merits, and the consent to forgo backwages should not affect his eligibility for selection grade. The court found that the petitioner was fully exonerated from the allegations, and the stigma of termination was removed. It ruled that the denial of selection grade was not in accordance with the applicable rules, and thus, the impugned order was set aside, directing the respondents to grant selection grade from the date of initial appointment with all consequential benefits. The writ petition was allowed with no costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Selection Grade - Entitlement to Selection Grade - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court held that once the order of termination was set aside and continuity of service was granted, the petitioner was entitled to selection grade from the date of initial appointment. The denial of selection grade based on prior termination was found to be inconsistent with applicable rules (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to selection grade from the date of initial appointment despite previous termination.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondents to grant selection grade to the petitioner from 14.06.1999 with all consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • selection grade
  • continuity of service
  • seniority
  • termination order
  • reinstatement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 310

WP No. 20567 of 2025

2026-09-17

S. M. Subramaniam, Krishnaswamy Govindarajan

Mr.S.N.Ravichandran, Mr. M.Kempraj

D.Thirunavukkarasu

The Registrar General, The Principal District Judge

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging denial of selection grade.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the impugned order and direct the grant of selection grade.

Filing Reason

Denial of selection grade based on prior termination.

Previous Decisions

Termination was set aside by the Appellate Authority.

Issues

Entitlement to selection grade despite previous termination Impact of reinstatement on service benefits

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for entitlement to selection grade based on reinstatement and continuity of service. Respondents contended that selection grade was not applicable due to absence of backwages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that once a termination order is set aside and continuity of service is granted, the employee is entitled to benefits such as selection grade from the date of initial appointment.

Judgment Excerpts

The benefit of selection grade was denied to the petitioner only on the ground that he was terminated from service. The order of removal was set aside. He was reinstated into the service without backwages, but with continuity of service.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed against the order of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, which denied the selection grade claim.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Recall of Witness in Civil Procedure Case — Clarifies Scope of Order 18 Rule 17 CPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Non-Compliance with CPC Provisions. High Court's failure to formulate a substantial question of law necessitated a remand for proper consideration under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.