High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions for Registration of Sale Deeds Due to Non-Regularisation. Refusal to Register Sale Deeds Upheld as Properties Were Not Regularised Under Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved writ appeals filed by the District Registrar and Sub Registrar of Dharmapuri District against the order of a learned single Judge allowing writ petitions for the registration of sale deeds. The writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash refusal check slips issued by the Sub Registrar for three properties. The petitioners claimed to have purchased the properties from R.M.Sankar through a power of attorney. The learned single Judge allowed the writ petitions on the grounds that adjacent properties had been registered and there was no impediment to register the sale deeds. The appellants contended that the writ petitions were allowed without giving them an opportunity to file counter affidavits, violating principles of natural justice. They argued that the properties were developed as unapproved layouts and could not be registered without regularisation as per Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908. The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Registration Act and the Tamil Nadu Regularisation of Unapproved Plots and Layouts Rules, 2017, concluding that the properties in question were not regularised and thus the refusal to register the sale deeds was justified. The court set aside the learned single Judge's order, allowing the writ appeals and closing the connected miscellaneous petitions.

Headnote

A) Registration Law - Refusal of Registration - Justification for Refusal - Registration Act, 1908, Section 22-A(2) - The court held that the refusal to register the sale deeds was justified as the properties were not regularised and did not meet the criteria under Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908. The learned single Judge's order was set aside as it was against the statutory provisions (Paras 17-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the refusal to register the sale deeds under Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ appeals, set aside the order of the learned single Judge, and upheld the refusal to register the sale deeds as the properties were not regularised under Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • Registration Act
  • 1908
  • Section 22-A(2)
  • Tamil Nadu Regularisation of Unapproved Plots and Layouts Rules
  • 2017
  • principles of natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 290

WA Nos. 2881, 2882 & 2883 of 2025

2026-09-16

Abdul Quddhose, R. Rajesh Vivekananthan

Mr. Dominic Savio David, Mr. K. Kathiresan

The District Registrar, Dharmapuri District, The Sub Registrar, Dharmapuri West, Dharmapuri District

Mohammed Junaith, Vidhya, Ramani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeals against the order of a learned single Judge allowing writ petitions for registration of sale deeds.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order allowing the writ petitions and uphold the refusal to register the sale deeds.

Filing Reason

The refusal to register the sale deeds was claimed to be illegal and against principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The learned single Judge allowed the writ petitions based on the registration of adjacent properties.

Issues

Whether the refusal to register the sale deeds was justified under Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908. Whether the learned single Judge's order violated principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the properties were developed as unapproved layouts and could not be registered without regularisation. Respondents contended that adjacent properties had been registered and there was no impediment to register their sale deeds.

Ratio Decidendi

The refusal to register the sale deeds was justified as the properties were not regularised and did not meet the criteria under Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the refusal to register the sale deeds was justified as the properties were not regularised. The order of the learned single Judge has been passed against the Section 22-A(2) of the Registration Act 1908 and the same cannot be sustained in the eye of law.

Procedural History

The writ appeals were filed against the order of a learned single Judge allowing writ petitions for registration of sale deeds, which were refused by the Sub Registrar.

Acts & Sections

  • Registration Act, 1908: Section 22-A(2)
  • Tamil Nadu Regularisation of Unapproved Plots and Layouts Rules, 2017: Rule 2(8), Rule 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Admission Procedures in Engineering College Case — Validity of Admissions Challenged.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Arbitration Dispute Over Contractual Obligations. The court clarified the maintainability of cross objections in appeals under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, emphasizing that if the original appeal is inco...