High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Acid Attack. The court upheld the conviction of the appellants for murder based on eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence linking them to the crime.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two criminal appeals challenging the conviction and sentence of the appellants for the murder of a medical shop owner through an acid attack. The trial court had convicted the appellants under Section 302 IPC and Section 302 r/w 109 IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The prosecution's case was based on eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence. The deceased, after closing his shop, was attacked with acid by the appellants, leading to severe injuries and eventual death. Eyewitnesses, including the deceased's wife and neighbors, testified to seeing the accused at the scene. The appellants contended that the motive was not established and that the eyewitnesses' testimonies were unreliable due to the absence of a test identification parade. The prosecution argued that the eyewitnesses were credible and that the forensic evidence corroborated their accounts. The High Court found that while the motive was not clearly established, the eyewitness testimonies and medical evidence were sufficient to uphold the conviction. The court emphasized that the absence of a motive does not undermine the credibility of reliable eyewitnesses. Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the trial court's judgment and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Conviction for Murder - Evidence of Eyewitnesses - The trial court convicted the appellants for murder based on eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence linking them to the crime. The High Court upheld the conviction despite the lack of established motive, emphasizing the reliability of eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 374(2) - Held that the evidence presented sufficiently proved the complicity of the accused in the crime (Paras 23-24).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 IPC and Section 302 r/w 109 IPC was justified based on the evidence presented.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed both criminal appeals, affirming the trial court's conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for the appellants under Section 302 IPC and Section 302 r/w 109 IPC.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 302 r/w 109 IPC
  • Section 120(B) IPC
  • Section 106 Evidence Act
  • Section 313 Cr.P.C.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 119

CRL A No. 273 of 2021 and CRL A No. 211 of 2021

2026-09-15

N. Sathish Kumar, K. Rajasekar

2026:MHC:3906

Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan, Mr.B.Karthik, Mr.A.Kumaraguru, Mr.P.Srinivasan, Mr.C.R.Malarvannan

R.Prabhu, Mansoor Ahmad

State rep by The Inspector of Police, Bhavani Police Station, Erode

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against conviction for murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Challenging the trial court's judgment dated 11.03.2021.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellants based on eyewitness and forensic evidence.

Issues

Whether the conviction was justified based on the evidence presented. Whether the absence of motive undermined the prosecution's case.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the motive was not established and eyewitness testimonies were unreliable. The prosecution contended that the eyewitnesses were credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the absence of motive does not negate the credibility of reliable eyewitnesses and that corroborating forensic evidence can establish guilt.

Judgment Excerpts

The evidence of P.W.1 that he saw both the people coming in a motor cycle in high speed and throwing acid on the deceased. The absence of motive does not undermine the credibility of reliable eyewitnesses.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellants on 11.03.2021, leading to the filing of these appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 374(2), 313
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 109, 120(B)
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 106
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Sewer Project Funding Due to Lack of Financial Approval. Court Directs State Government to Consider Approval of Sewer Scheme Within Three Months.
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Professional Misconduct Findings Against Chartered Accountant and Firm — Severe Penalties Imposed.