High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous — Selection Process Completed. The court found that the selection process had concluded, rendering the petition moot under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's registration for the recruitment process of Tamil Nadu Ration Shops 2024 for the posts of 'Packers' and 'Salesman'. The petitioner requested that the interview and selection process be conducted on merits, and that a merit list be published, ensuring equal opportunity for participation in the interview. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents were heard. The Government Advocate submitted that the selection process had already concluded, a fact not seriously disputed by the petitioner’s counsel. Given this factual position, the court found that nothing remained to be adjudicated in the writ petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous, with no costs awarded. The order was issued on 03-09-2026.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Dismissal of Writ Petition - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for consideration in the recruitment process for the post of 'Packers' and 'Salesman' after the selection process was completed. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous, noting that the selection process had already concluded, and thus no further action could be taken (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition for consideration in the recruitment process should be allowed despite the completion of the selection process.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting that the selection process had already been completed.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Article 226
  • Recruitment Process
  • Infructuous Petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 78

WP No. 36548 of 2024

2026-09-03

C.Kumarappan

2026:MHC:3694

Ms.K. Indumathy Venkatesh, Mr.V.SIVALINGAM

R.Naresh Kumar

The Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Government Of Tamilnadu, The Registrar Co-operative Societies, Joint Registrar Of Co-operative Societies

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for mandamus regarding recruitment process

Remedy Sought

Consideration of registration in recruitment process

Filing Reason

To ensure equal opportunity in the selection process

Issues

Whether the writ petition should be allowed despite the completion of the selection process.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought consideration in recruitment process. Government Advocate stated selection process was completed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that once the selection process is completed, a writ petition seeking consideration in that process becomes infructuous.

Judgment Excerpts

The selection process has already been over, which factum is not seriously disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed and heard, followed by a dismissal due to the completion of the selection process.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Chief Translator and Interpreter, Upholds Overriding Rule 58 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Service Rules, 2000. Chief Justice's Power to Relax Qualifications Under Rule 58(b) No...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Guarantors' Liability Under SICA — Recovery Proceedings Not Prohibited Against Guarantors.