Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Salary Payment Order. The court upheld the direction for salary payment to the fourth respondent during the suspension period, citing failure to revoke suspension and principles of natural justice under Section 23(b) of the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Writ Appeal filed by Sri Gopalakrishna Higher Secondary School against an order directing them to pay salary to V. Ramakrishnan, a Drawing Teacher, for the period of his suspension. The fourth respondent was initially suspended in 2017 due to misconduct, leading to disciplinary proceedings and his eventual dismissal in 2018. After a series of legal challenges and reinstatements, the fourth respondent sought salary for the suspension period from June 2019 to March 2020. The appellant contended that the suspension was valid and that the fourth respondent should have joined duty after four months. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition, upholding the order of the first respondent, which mandated salary payment. The court noted that the appellant had not revoked the suspension or called the fourth respondent to join duty, thus establishing liability for salary payment. The appeal was dismissed, and the court directed compliance with the salary payment order within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Salary Payment During Suspension - Liability of Educational Institution - Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973, Section 23(b) - The court held that the appellant failed to revoke the suspension order and call the fourth respondent to join duty, thus making them liable to pay salary for the suspension period. The proceedings were deemed appellate in nature, and the principles of natural justice were upheld. (Paras 33).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant was liable to pay salary to the fourth respondent during the period of suspension.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Writ Appeal was dismissed, upholding the order directing the appellant to pay salary to the fourth respondent for the suspension period from 18.06.2019 to 24.03.2020, with a compliance directive within four weeks.

Law Points

  • natural justice
  • suspension
  • salary payment
  • educational institutions
  • appellate proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 53

W.A.(MD)No.14 of 2025

2026-09-09

C.V. Karthikeyan, R. Sakthivel

Mr. Srinath Sridevan, Mr. P. Sujai Krishna, Mr. M. Kannan, Mr. K. Ragatheesh Kumar

Sri Gopalakrishna Higher Secondary School

V. Ramakrishnan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Appeal against an order directing salary payment during suspension.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the order for salary payment.

Filing Reason

The fourth respondent claimed salary for the suspension period.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition, upholding the order of the first respondent.

Issues

Liability of the appellant to pay salary during the suspension period Compliance with principles of natural justice in the proceedings

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the fourth respondent should have joined duty after four months of suspension. The fourth respondent contended that the suspension was never revoked, and thus salary was due.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that the appellant's failure to revoke the suspension and call the fourth respondent to duty established liability for salary payment, affirming the appellate nature of the proceedings under Section 23(b) of the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant failed to revoke the suspension order and call the fourth respondent to join duty, thus making them liable to pay salary for the suspension period. The proceedings under Section 23(b) of the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 are appellate proceedings.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the first respondent directing salary payment, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act: 23(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Inspect Unauthorized Construction and Issue Stop Work Notice. Corporation Directed to Initiate Further Action for Unauthorized Deviations Within Twelve Weeks.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Complaint in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Delay in Filing. The court found that the complaint was filed beyond the statutory limitation period, thus lacking jurisdiction.