Case Note & Summary
The case involved two writ appeals questioning the order of a learned Single Judge regarding a tender for engaging 50 labourers for Dengue work in Srivilliputhur Municipality. The appellant in WA(MD) No.1417 of 2026 challenged the rejection of its bid as L1, as it quoted the minimum wage of Rs.578.87 per day, while the appellant in WA(MD) No.1353 of 2026 quoted Rs.510 per day, which was below the minimum wage. The learned Single Judge directed a fresh tender process, stating that the declaration of L1 was improper. The court noted the importance of ensuring that labourers are paid at least the minimum wage and emphasized that the bidder quoting the minimum wage should be declared as the successful bidder. The court also highlighted that if both bidders quoted the same minimum wage, negotiations should be conducted, and if they remained equal, the more experienced bidder should be selected. The appeals were disposed of with directions for a fresh tender to be issued, ensuring compliance with minimum wage standards. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Headnote
A) Administrative Law - Tender Process - Declaration of L1 Bidder - Not proper declaration of L1 bidder - The court held that the appellant who quoted the minimum wage should have been declared as L1, and directed a fresh tender to be issued ensuring compliance with minimum wage requirements. (Paras 2-8).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the declaration of L1 bidder in the tender process was proper and if a fresh tender should be issued.
Final Decision
The court upheld the direction for a fresh tender process, ensuring that the minimum wage is quoted by participants and that negotiations are held if bids are equal. The appeals were disposed of with no costs.
Law Points
- Tender process
- Minimum wage compliance
- Declaration of L1 bidder
- Fresh tender issuance
