Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Establishment of TASMAC Outlet — No Application Received for FL2 License.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed as a Public Interest Litigation by the petitioner seeking a Mandamus against various respondents to prevent the establishment of a retail TASMAC outlet in Tharavaithoppu Village, Ramanathapuram District. The petitioner expressed concerns regarding a representation made on 27.08.2026, which was based on an agreement purportedly allowing the use of premises for running a liquor shop. The petitioner cited a previous order from a Co-ordinate Division Bench that had issued a perpetual restraint on opening TASMAC outlets in Rameshwaram. The Government Pleader informed the court that no application for an FL2 license had been submitted, and any future applications would consider public objections. The court directed that the petitioner must be notified if any application for an FL2 license was received. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner the liberty to approach the court again if there were indications of a new application for a liquor shop. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Restraint on Establishment of TASMAC Outlet - Constitution of India, Article 226 - The petitioner sought to restrain the respondents from granting permission for a retail TASMAC outlet based on a representation. The court noted that no application for an FL2 license had been received and directed that the petitioner be notified if any application was made in the future. Held that the petition was disposed of with liberty to approach the court again if necessary (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to restrain the respondents from granting permission for a retail TASMAC outlet in Tharavaithoppu Village.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of, with directions for the petitioner to be notified if any application for an FL2 license was received in the future. No costs were awarded.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Writ of Mandamus
  • FL2 License
  • Representation
  • Perpetual Restraint
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 27

W.P(MD)No.26153 of 2026

2026-09-10

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, R.SAKTHIVEL

Mr. M.Jerin Mathew, Mr.M.P.Senthil, Mr.I.Murugesan, Mr.S.Sivaneshan, Mr.T.Thirumurugan

Ravi

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Prohibition and Excise Department, Ramanathapuram District, The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Ramanathapuram District, The Executive Officer, Pamban Panchayat, Theevu Manamazhil Mandram

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation seeking to restrain the establishment of a retail TASMAC outlet.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the establishment of a TASMAC outlet.

Filing Reason

Concerns regarding a representation for establishing a liquor shop.

Previous Decisions

Previous orders restrained the opening of TASMAC outlets in Rameshwaram.

Issues

Whether to restrain the respondents from granting permission for a retail TASMAC outlet.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued against the establishment of a liquor shop based on public interest. The respondents indicated no application had been received for an FL2 license.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of public notification regarding any future applications for liquor licenses, reinforcing the importance of public interest in licensing matters.

Judgment Excerpts

The writ petition has been filed in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation seeking Mandamus against the respondents. The petitioner apprehends that it is only a ruse to open a liquor vending shop. We direct that the said official should also examine the import of the order dated 25.11.2019.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed and heard on 10.09.2026, with representations and previous orders considered during the proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Resignation Acceptance in Banking Service Regulations — Employee's Right to Withdraw Resignation Affirmed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Dismissal of ULP Complaints; Voluntary Resignation Scheme Not Retrenchment Under Section 25H ID Act. Workers' Claim for Re-employment Rejected as Agreement Dated 05.12.1991 Was Not a Settlement Under BIR A...