High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Petition in Commercial Dispute Case Due to Transaction Deemed Commercial. The court found that the transaction between two merchants in the same field constituted a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) against an order passed by the Principal District Judge (Commercial Court) at Cuddalore. The petitioner, Soundararajan Cashews, represented by its Proprietrix S.R. Kavitha, sought to set aside the order dated 20.07.2026, which rejected their application for the rejection of the plaint in a suit filed by African Kaju Trading Pvt Ltd for recovery of money. The petitioner contended that the transaction was merely a loan and did not constitute a commercial transaction as defined under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The petitioner also argued that the suit was entertained without following the mandatory pre-litigation mediation process under Section 12A of the Act. The court analyzed the nature of the transaction, noting that both parties were engaged in the cashew business and that the loan was intended to clear claims raised by another merchant. The court concluded that the transaction was indeed a commercial dispute, as it involved two merchants in the course of their business. The court further noted that the lower court had already granted leave to dispense with the mediation requirement, thus rejecting the second ground for rejection of the plaint. Ultimately, the court upheld the lower court's order and dismissed the Civil Revision Petition, imposing no costs.

Headnote

A) Commercial Law - Definition of Commercial Transaction - Transaction qualifies as commercial dispute - Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 2(1)(c) - The court held that the transaction between two merchants involved in the same field of business constituted a commercial dispute, rejecting the argument that it was merely a loan transaction. (Paras 12-13)

B) Civil Procedure - Rejection of Plaint - Grounds for rejection not satisfied - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VII Rule 11 - The court found that the lower court had granted leave to dispense with pre-litigation mediation, thus the plaint could not be rejected on that ground. (Paras 14-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transaction in question qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and whether the plaint was liable to be rejected for not following pre-litigation mediation requirements.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court upheld the order of the lower court and dismissed the Civil Revision Petition, stating that the transaction was a commercial dispute and the requirements for pre-litigation mediation had been satisfied.

Law Points

  • Commercial transaction definition
  • rejection of plaint
  • pre-litigation mediation
  • Section 115 Cr.PC
  • Order VII Rule 11 CPC
  • Section 2(1)(c) Commercial Courts Act
  • 2015
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 4

CRP No. 6063 of 2026

2026-09-29

N. Anand Venkatesh

G.M. Ananthakumar, T.S. Baskaran

Soundararajan Cashews

African Kaju Trading Pvt Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Petition regarding the rejection of plaint in a commercial dispute.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the order rejecting the application for rejection of plaint.

Filing Reason

The plaint was filed for recovery of money and creating a charge over immovable property.

Previous Decisions

The lower court had rejected the application for rejection of plaint.

Issues

Whether the transaction qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Whether the plaint was liable to be rejected for not following pre-litigation mediation requirements

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the transaction was merely a loan and did not constitute a commercial dispute. Respondent contended that the transaction was a commercial dispute as both parties were engaged in the same business.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the nature of the transaction between two merchants in the same field constituted a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and that the lower court's order regarding pre-litigation mediation was valid.

Judgment Excerpts

The transaction involved between the parties is prima facie a commercial transaction. The dispute will fall within the meaning of the term commercial dispute as defined under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of the Act.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed IA No. 1288 of 2025 under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of plaint, which was rejected by the lower court, leading to the present Civil Revision Petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 115
  • Commercial Courts Act, 2015: Section 2(1)(c), Section 12A
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order VII Rule 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Unmarried Woman's Petition for Abortion Under MTP Act — Recognizes Reproductive Rights. Citing legislative intent to include unmarried women in the MTP Act, the court emphasized the violation of personal autonomy and bodily int...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to justify the conviction under Section 4 of the Act.