High Court Upholds Teacher's Claim for Unpaid Salary and Benefits Due to Surplus Status. Court Finds No Fault of Teacher in De-Recognition of Institution, Mandating Salary Payment Under Articles 226 and 227.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose when the Petitioner, a lecturer at Shree Nutan Prashala Junior College, sought payment of unpaid salary for the period from June 1, 2010, to May 15, 2013, after being declared surplus due to the college's decision to stop admissions. The Petitioner was appointed in 1992, and his services were made permanent in 1993. However, in December 2010, he was transferred to another office for a survey and later directed to join another college in 2013. Despite multiple requests for salary payment, no response was received, leading to the filing of this writ petition in November 2022. The Petitioner argued that similar cases had resulted in favorable judgments, specifically citing the case of Vitthal Ramaling Nivargi v. State of Maharashtra, where the court directed payment of unpaid salaries to a similarly situated teacher. The Respondent-State contended that the responsibility for salary payment lay with the management of the college, as the Petitioner was declared surplus without their consent. The Court analyzed the facts and previous judgments, concluding that the Petitioner was entitled to salary for the specified period, as the lack of work was not his fault. The Court ordered the Respondents to pay all due amounts within four weeks and consider the Petitioner for selection grade benefits. The petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Entitlement to Unpaid Salary - Constitution of India, Articles 226, 227 - The Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for unpaid salary for 34 months and 18 days due to being declared surplus without fault. The Court held that the Petitioner was entitled to salary as the de-recognition of the institution was not due to his fault, referencing prior judgments that supported the claim (Paras 2, 10-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to unpaid salary and benefits as a surplus teacher.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court granted the writ of mandamus, ordering the Respondents to pay the Petitioner all due salaries and consider him for selection grade benefits within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Articles 226 and 227
  • unpaid salary
  • surplus teachers
  • selection grade
  • consequential benefits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 122

Writ Petition No. 2362 of 2023

2026-10-13

Abhay Ahuja, Neeraj P. Dhote

C. G. Gavnekar, Shashank Mangale, Ashitosh Jambilkar, Prajakta Kamble, Tejas J. Kapre

Nitin Shrikant Karade

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for unpaid salary and benefits.

Remedy Sought

Writ of mandamus for payment of unpaid salary and selection grade benefits.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of salary despite being declared surplus.

Previous Decisions

Court had previously ruled in favor of similar cases regarding unpaid salaries.

Issues

Entitlement to unpaid salary Responsibility for salary payment

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for salary payment based on prior judgments. Respondent contended that the management was responsible for salary payment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Petitioner was entitled to salary as the de-recognition of the institution was not due to his fault, and similar cases had established the precedent for such claims.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner has prayed for writ of mandamus against Respondents No. 1 to 4 to pay the Petitioner unpaid salary of 34 months and 18 days. The Court held that the Petitioner was entitled to salary as the de-recognition of the institution was not due to his fault.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on November 5, 2022, after multiple requests for salary payment went unanswered. The Court heard the matter on September 11, 2026, and subsequently on September 24, 2026, and October 12, 2026, before delivering the judgment on October 13, 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Senior Citizens Tribunal Order Directing Son to Vacate Flat and Pay Maintenance to Mother — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 by Deciding Title and Granti...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No. 3 for Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Gold Bars in Bank Fraud Case. Court holds that possession of stolen property soon after theft, coupled with lack of explanation, is sufficient for conviction under Sec...