High Court Dismisses Petitions on Cattle Custody and Maintenance Charges. Court Upheld Rs.100/- Per Day Maintenance as Reasonable Under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved three Criminal Writ Petitions filed by the Shri Siddeshwar Shivmandir Trust challenging the orders of the Revisional Court regarding the custody and maintenance of cattle. The petitioner-Trust sought to contest the judgment dated 09/06/2026, which directed the temporary custody of the bullocks to be handed over to the respondents-owners upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs.1,20,000/- and a maintenance charge of Rs.100/- per day per animal. The petitioner argued that the amount for maintenance should be Rs.200/- per day as per the guidelines issued by the Maharashtra Animal Welfare Board. The respondents-owners contended that the maintenance charges should be based on reasonable costs rather than arbitrary claims. The court analyzed the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, particularly Section 35, which allows for discretion in determining maintenance costs. The court noted that the Revisional Court had found the maintenance charge of Rs.100/- to be reasonable and justified, especially since the petitioner-Trust had failed to provide adequate evidence for their claims. The court ultimately dismissed the petitions, affirming the Revisional Court's decision and directing the petitioner-Trust to hand over the cattle to the respondents-owners within 15 days upon their depositing the maintenance amount. The police were instructed to prepare a panchanama for the custody transfer, ensuring the animals' proper care and health.

Headnote

A) Animal Welfare - Maintenance Charges - Reasonable Maintenance Amount - Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Section 35 - The Revisional Court imposed a maintenance charge of Rs.100/- per day per animal, which was deemed reasonable under the circumstances, considering the discretion allowed to the Magistrate. The petitioner-Trust's claim for Rs.200/- or Rs.300/- was unsupported by adequate reasoning or evidence. Held that the Revisional Court's decision was justified (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Revisional Court erred in imposing a maintenance charge of Rs.100/- per day per animal instead of Rs.200/- as per the guidelines.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Criminal Writ Petitions were dismissed. The petitioner-Trust was directed to hand over the custody of the cattle to the respondents-owners within 15 days upon their depositing Rs.100/- per day per animal from the date of custody until the judgment date. The police were instructed to prepare a panchanama for the custody transfer.

Law Points

  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  • 1960
  • maintenance of animals
  • indemnity bond
  • discretion of Magistrate
  • statutory guidelines
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 106

CRI. WP 488 of 2026

2026-10-13

MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Mrs. Kirti Deshpande, Mrs. S.V. Kolhe, Mr. M.N. Ali

Shri Siddeshwar Shivmandir Trust

The State of Maharashtra, Shaikh Chhotu Shaikh Khairati, Dilip S/o Pralhadrao Chavhan, Pramod @ Pramodsing Trambaksing Yewtikar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the custody and maintenance orders regarding seized cattle.

Remedy Sought

Modification of maintenance charges from Rs.100/- to Rs.200/- or Rs.300/- per day per animal.

Filing Reason

Petitioner-Trust contested the Revisional Court's order regarding maintenance charges.

Previous Decisions

The Revisional Court had directed the release of cattle with a maintenance charge of Rs.100/- per day.

Issues

Whether the Revisional Court erred in imposing a maintenance charge of Rs.100/- per day per animal instead of Rs.200/- or Rs.300/-. Whether the petitioner-Trust provided sufficient grounds for the requested maintenance amount.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner-Trust argued for Rs.200/- or Rs.300/- per day based on guidelines. Respondents-owners contended that Rs.100/- was reasonable and based on statutory provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the discretion of the Revisional Court in determining maintenance charges, affirming that the amount of Rs.100/- per day per animal was reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with statutory guidelines.

Judgment Excerpts

The Revisional Court imposed a maintenance charge of Rs.100/- per day per animal, which was deemed reasonable under the circumstances. The petitioner-Trust's claim for Rs.200/- or Rs.300/- was unsupported by adequate reasoning or evidence.

Procedural History

The petitioner-Trust filed Criminal Writ Petitions challenging the Revisional Court's order dated 09/06/2026 regarding the custody and maintenance of cattle.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960: Section 35
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals) Rules, 2017: Rule 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Multiplier and Modifies Deductions. Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence and computation of compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is uph...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition Seeking Renewal of Bank Guarantees Pending Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award. Liquidated Damages Claim in Public Utility Contract Examined for Prima Facie Case in Light of Saw Pipes and Construction...