High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Applications in Sexual Offence Cases — Maintainability Bar Under BNSS Affirmed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involved two anticipatory bail applications filed by different applicants accused of sexual offences. The first applicant, Kasif Sahabuddin Khan, was accused in Crime No. 485/2026 under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The victim, aged 15 years and 5 months, alleged that the applicant had committed sexual intercourse with her multiple times under threats. The second applicant, Ajay Ganesh Ade, faced allegations in Crime No. 250/2026 under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where the victim, aged 14 years and 4 months, initially denied any assault but later alleged rape under threats of making her photographs viral. The court first addressed the maintainability of the applications in light of Section 482(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, which bars anticipatory bail if a prima facie case is established. The court noted that the legislative intent was to protect minors from sexual offences and that the bar was not absolute but contingent upon the existence of a prima facie case. The court found that both victims were minors and the allegations met the statutory requirements for the offences charged. Consequently, the court rejected both applications, affirming the statutory bar on anticipatory bail under Section 482(4).

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Maintainability - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 482(4) - The court held that anticipatory bail applications are not maintainable if a prima facie case under the specified sections is made out, as per the statutory bar. The court emphasized the need to examine whether the ingredients of the alleged offences are satisfied before granting bail (Paras 25-26).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the anticipatory bail applications are maintainable in light of the bar under Section 482(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court rejected both anticipatory bail applications, affirming that the statutory bar under Section 482(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 applies as prima facie cases were established against both applicants.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • maintainability
  • prima facie case
  • statutory bar
  • sexual offences
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 104

Criminal Application [ABA] No. 794 of 2026 and No. 771 of 2026

2026-10-06

M.M. Nerlikar

Shri V.N. Morande, Shri D.J. Sharma, Shri D.V. Chauhan, Ms S.N. Thakur, Ms S.V. Bhandwalkar

Kasif Sahabuddin Khan, Ajay Ganesh Ade

The State of Maharashtra, Victim

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Anticipatory bail applications in sexual offence cases.

Remedy Sought

Anticipatory bail by the applicants.

Filing Reason

Accusations of sexual offences against the applicants.

Issues

Whether the anticipatory bail applications are maintainable in light of the bar under Section 482(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the bar under Section 482(4) is not absolute and the court can examine the prima facie case. Opposition contended that the statutory bar is clear and must be strictly interpreted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that anticipatory bail applications are not maintainable if a prima facie case under the specified sections is made out, as per the statutory bar.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that anticipatory bail applications are not maintainable if a prima facie case under the specified sections is made out, as per the statutory bar. The applications filed by the applicants are not maintainable, and the bar provided under Section 482(4) would operate.

Procedural History

The court heard the anticipatory bail applications filed by two different applicants in two different crimes, addressing the issue of maintainability first.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita: 482(4)
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act:
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: 64[2][i], 64[2][m], 65[1], 137(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Sand Quarry Lease Modification — Upholds Amended Rules Application. The court ruled that the amended rules apply to pending appeals, granting a three-year lease from execution.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Rights in Trademark Dispute — Clarifies Use of 'Ramdev' Trademark. The court determined that the respondents' use of the trademark 'Ramdev' infringed upon the appellant's registered rights under the Trade and Merch...