High Court Allows Petition for Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act Due to Lack of Due Process. Court Emphasizes Right to Compensation and Proper Procedure for Land Acquisition.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking protection of her possession over 67R of land in Survey No.50/01 and compensation for land acquisition by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The petitioner’s husband had purchased the land in 1989, and after his death, the petitioner became the sole owner. In 2013, an award was passed for acquiring land from a different survey number, which did not include the petitioner’s land. The respondents later attempted to dispossess the petitioner from her land without a valid award for acquisition. The petitioner contended that she had not been compensated for the land and sought a direction to restrain the respondents from dispossessing her. The respondents admitted that the land was affected but claimed that the petitioner could seek compensation through arbitration. The court analyzed the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956, and concluded that the respondents had not followed the necessary legal procedures for land acquisition. The court emphasized that the petitioner could not be dispossessed without due process and directed the respondents to acquire the land formally and pay compensation. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were ordered to complete the acquisition process within three months.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation and Possession - Entitlement to Compensation - National Highways Act, 1956, Sections 3A, 3D - The court held that the petitioner was entitled to compensation for land not formally acquired, as no award had been passed for the land in question, thus preventing dispossession without due process. (Paras 15-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation and protection of possession of land under the National Highways Act, 1956.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to acquire the land admeasuring 26R in Survey No.50/01 by passing an award under the National Highways Act, 1956, and to pay compensation within three months. The petitioner was to hand over possession only after the award was passed and compensation paid.

Law Points

  • Land acquisition
  • compensation
  • due process
  • National Highways Act
  • 1956
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 84

WP-6004 of 2021

2026-10-13

Jitendra Jain, Kishore C. Sant

P. V. Barde, R. S. Sarvadnya, D. S. Manorkar, S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, S. B. Gastgar

Sangita Balbhim More

Union of India, National Highways Authorities of India, Maharashtra National Highway Authority of India, PIU-National Highway Authority of India, Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, Sub-Divisional Officer, Pandurang Yashwant More

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking protection of possession and compensation for land acquisition.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to restrain respondents from dispossessing her and to pay compensation.

Filing Reason

Respondents attempted to dispossess the petitioner without a valid award for land acquisition.

Previous Decisions

No prior award had been passed for the acquisition of the petitioner's land.

Issues

Entitlement to compensation for land not formally acquired Legality of dispossession without due process

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that no award had been passed for her land and sought compensation. Respondents admitted no award was in favor of the petitioner but offered compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that dispossession without a formal award and due process under the National Highways Act, 1956, is impermissible, reinforcing the right to compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

The award dated 1 April 2013 is not in the name of the petitioner, but it relates to land bearing Survey No.50/04 admeasuring 26R, in favour of Shri. Pandurang More. The petitioner cannot be deprived of her right under Article 300A of the Constitution of India without due process of law. The respondents shall not carry out any construction on the plots of the petitioners for the purpose of National Highway till all the stage of issuance of declaration under section 3-D of the National Highways Act, 1956 are completed.

Procedural History

The petition was filed seeking directions against the respondents regarding land acquisition and possession. The court reserved the matter for judgment after hearing the parties.

Acts & Sections

  • National Highways Act, 1956: 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3G, 3H
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Partially Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Reduces Award from Rs.6,68,130 to Rs.4,50,000. Commissioner Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Amount Beyond Claimed Sum Without Amendment.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Additional Evidence in Motor Accident Claim Appeal — Service Certificate and Income Tax Returns Admitted to Determine Actual Income. The court held that in a claim under a beneficial legislation, the court should ...