High Court Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Liability of Insurance Company Exonerated. The deceased was not covered under the insurance policy as he was unauthorizedly traveling in a trolley attached to a tractor.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, which directed the appellant and the driver to pay compensation of Rs.2,73,500/- to the claimants for the death of Gorakh Sadhu Denge in a road accident. The deceased died while traveling in a trolley attached to a tractor owned by the appellant, which was driven by the driver at the time of the accident. The claimants, who were the deceased's family members, sought compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Tribunal found that the tractor was insured but exonerated the insurance company from liability, ruling that the trolley was unauthorizedly used for carrying passengers. The Tribunal assessed the deceased's notional income at Rs.3,000/- per month and applied a multiplier of 11, resulting in a compensation amount that included conventional heads. The appellant contended that the deceased became a third party after falling from the trolley, thus making the insurance company liable. The insurance company argued that the deceased was traveling in a goods vehicle, which was not covered under the policy. The court analyzed various precedents and concluded that the insurance company was not liable as the deceased was not traveling for loading or unloading goods. However, the court found the compensation awarded inadequate and increased it significantly for loss of consortium and funeral expenses, directing the appellant and driver to pay an additional amount to the claimants. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Insurance Liability - Exoneration of Insurance Company - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 147 - The insurance company was exonerated from liability as the deceased was unauthorizedly traveling in a trolley attached to a tractor, which was not covered under the insurance policy. The court held that the deceased was not a passenger but merely traveling to reach a destination, thus the claim was not covered (Paras 24-24).

B) Compensation - Assessment of Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 - The court found the compensation awarded by the Tribunal inadequate and increased it significantly for loss of consortium and funeral expenses. The court directed additional compensation to be paid to the claimants (Paras 25-27).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation for the death of the deceased who fell from a trolley attached to a tractor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed. The court directed the appellant and driver to pay additional compensation of Rs.1,80,500/- to the claimants over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal, without interest.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 173
  • compensation
  • insurance liability
  • third party claim
  • notional income
  • conventional heads
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 80

First Appeal No. 2243 of 2013

2026-10-13

Rohit W. Joshi

Mr. Ajit M. Gholap, Mr. D.R. Korde, Mr. R.V. Gore, Mr. Sudhir V. Kulkarni

Bhagwat s/o Dnyanoba Misal

Shardabai w/o Gorakh Dhenge, Rewannath s/o Gorakh Dhenge, Bharat s/o Gorakh Dhenge, Sudarshan s/o Ankush Misal, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the award of compensation in a motor accident claim.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the liability of the insurance company and the amount of compensation awarded.

Filing Reason

Claim for compensation due to the death of the deceased in a road accident.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal awarded compensation which the appellant contested.

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable for the death of the deceased who fell from the trolley. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was adequate.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deceased became a third party after falling from the trolley, thus making the insurance company liable. Insurance company contended that the deceased was unauthorizedly traveling in a goods vehicle, which was not covered under the policy.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurance company was not liable as the deceased was not traveling for loading or unloading goods and the policy did not cover such claims. The court also found the compensation awarded by the Tribunal inadequate and increased it significantly.

Judgment Excerpts

The insurance company cannot be held liable to honor the claim. The compensation awarded towards loss of financial dependency appears to be proper. The appeal is dismissed.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, which directed compensation to be paid to the claimants.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173, Section 166
  • Employees' Compensation Act, 1923:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Due to High Court's Jurisdictional Overreach. High Court's Reassessment of Evidence in Writ Jurisdiction Found Impermissible Under Article 226.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Partition Suit Due to Unilateral Request for Setting Aside Compromise Decree. Compromise Decree Cannot Be Set Aside Without Joint Request from All Parties Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.