High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Seasonal Employees Challenging Termination Due to Lack of Legal Right. Petitioners' Claims for Regularization of Seasonal Employment Denied as Their Roles Were Seasonal and Not Permanent.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by 38 Petitioners, comprising Seasonal Clerks, Peons, and Sweepers, against the Union of India and the Haj Committee of India, seeking to quash their termination order dated 25th November 2023. The Petitioners claimed to have been employed since 2009 to assist Indian pilgrims during the Haj pilgrimage, asserting that their work had increased post-COVID-19 and was of a continuous nature. They argued that their termination was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice as they were not given a hearing. The Respondents contended that the Petitioners were engaged only for seasonal work, and their contracts were terminated as per the rules governing their employment under the Haj Committee Act, 2002. The court analyzed the nature of the Petitioners' employment, referencing relevant sections of the Haj Committee Act and Rules, concluding that the Petitioners had no legal right to claim regularization as their roles were seasonal and not permanent. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the Petitioners could not claim rights to permanent employment based on their seasonal contracts. The court also noted that the Haj Committee had no current need for seasonal employees in Mumbai, thus finding no violation of service rules. The Writ Petition was dismissed without costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Termination of Services - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners challenged the termination of their services as seasonal employees without being heard, claiming violation of natural justice. The court held that the nature of their employment was seasonal, and they had no legal right to claim regularization of services (Paras 1-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the Petitioners' services was arbitrary and whether they have a legal right to regularization of their employment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Writ Petition was dismissed, affirming that the Petitioners had no legal right to claim regularization of their services as their employment was seasonal in nature.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • principles of natural justice
  • seasonal employment
  • regularization of services
  • contractual appointments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 74

Writ Petition No. 2652 of 2024

2026-10-14

Dr. Neela Gokhale, G. S. Kulkarni

Mr. Vicky Nagrani, Mr. Mahesh Shukla, Niraj Tripathi, Siddhikesh Shinde

The Union of India, Haj Committee of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging termination of seasonal employees

Remedy Sought

Quashing of termination order and regularization of services

Filing Reason

Termination of services without opportunity to be heard

Issues

Whether the termination of the Petitioners' services was arbitrary. Whether the Petitioners have a legal right to regularization of their employment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that their termination violated principles of natural justice. Respondents contended that the Petitioners were engaged only for seasonal work and had no right to claim regularization.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that employees engaged on a seasonal basis cannot claim rights to permanent employment or regularization, as their roles were temporary and governed by specific rules under the Haj Committee Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners claim to have worked in their respective posts as seasonal employees since 2009. The Petitioners were not given any opportunity to be heard; thus, there is a violation of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioners have no legal right to claim permanent appointment and regularisation. The employment of such seasonal workers will come to an end by efflux of time.

Procedural History

The Writ Petition was filed challenging the termination order dated 25th November 2023. The court reserved judgment on 29th September 2026 and pronounced it on 14th October 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Haj Committee Act, 2002: Section 16, Section 44
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Impounding of Unregistered MoU Under Stamp Act in Civil Suit — Trial Court's Rejection Set Aside. Section 33 of Maharashtra Stamp Act Mandates Impounding of Insufficiently Stamped Documents Irrespective of Registration Requ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Commissioner to Record Evidence of Aged and Ailing Plaintiff in Civil Suit — Order 18 Rule 4 and Order 26 Rule 1 CPC. The court held that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion judiciously and that...