High Court Upholds Grant of Probate in Testamentary Suit Due to Valid Execution of Will. The Plaintiff Established the Will's Validity, Dismissing Claims of Undue Influence and Incapacity.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a challenge to the probate of the last Will and Testament of Tarapada Chatterjee, granted by a Single Judge of the High Court. The Appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original Defendant Avijit Chatterjee, contested the validity of the Will, claiming it was not executed by the deceased. The Plaintiff, Shanta Ashok Tolat, filed the Testamentary Petition, asserting that she was the sole executrix named in the Will dated 21.3.1989. The original Defendant, Avijit Chatterjee, opposed the grant of probate, claiming that their father died intestate and that the Will was a fabrication. The court framed issues regarding the validity of the Will and the Plaintiff's entitlement to relief. The Plaintiff presented evidence from four witnesses, including attesting witnesses who confirmed the execution of the Will. The Defendant countered with evidence suggesting the Will was invalid due to the testator's alleged incapacity and the absence of his name in the Will. The learned Single Judge concluded that the Plaintiff had established the Will's validity, dismissing the Defendant's caveat and granting probate. The court emphasized that the burden of proof lay with the Defendant to establish any suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will, which they failed to do. The decision underscored the importance of the Plaintiff's relationship with the testator and the absence of evidence supporting the Defendant's claims of undue influence or incapacity. Ultimately, the court upheld the grant of probate, affirming the validity of the Will.

Headnote

A) Testamentary Law - Valid Execution of Will - Burden of Proof - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 63 - The court held that the Plaintiff established the valid execution of the Will by providing evidence from attesting witnesses, and the Defendant failed to prove that the Will was not validly executed. The court found no suspicious circumstances that would invalidate the Will (Paras 12-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the last Will and Testament of Tarapada Chatterjee was validly executed?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court upheld the grant of probate, affirming the validity of the Will executed by Tarapada Chatterjee. The court found that the Plaintiff had established the Will's validity and dismissed the caveat filed by the Defendant.

Law Points

  • Probate
  • Testamentary Succession
  • Valid Execution of Will
  • Sound and Disposing Mind
  • Burden of Proof
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 22

Appeal No.69 of 2021 in Testamentary Suit No.67 of 1997

2026-10-07

Sarang V. Kotwal, Ranjit Singh Rajabhonsale

Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Mr. Virendra J. Tulzapurkar

Ashim Chatterjee, Anouk Chatterjee

Shanta Ashok Tolat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the grant of probate of a Will.

Remedy Sought

The Appellants sought to overturn the grant of probate.

Filing Reason

The Plaintiff filed for probate claiming to be the sole executrix of the Will.

Previous Decisions

The Single Judge granted probate of the Will on 13.2.2020.

Issues

Validity of the Will Burden of proof regarding execution

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellants argued that the Will was not validly executed and raised suspicious circumstances. The Respondent contended that the Will was validly executed and that the Appellants failed to prove their claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the burden of proof lies with the propounder of the Will to establish its validity, and the absence of evidence supporting claims of undue influence or incapacity led to the conclusion that the Will was validly executed.

Judgment Excerpts

The Plaintiff was the only person who was available at hand for assisting the testator. The execution of the Will was proved and there was no reason to doubt the veracity of the deposition by Sandeep Dave.

Procedural History

The Testamentary Petition was filed on 30.6.1995, and the probate was granted by a Single Judge on 13.2.2020. The Appellants filed an appeal against this order.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Section 68
  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 63
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Sections 8(c) read with Section 20(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside for failure to comply with Sections 42 and 50.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Wealth Tax Assessment in Hindu Succession Case — Clarifies Property Devolution Under Hindu Law.