High Court of Bombay Upholds Writ Petition in Foreign Trade Regulation Case — Import Restrictions Not Applicable to Goods Arrived Before Notification. Citing that the notification cannot retrospectively affect goods that arrived prior to its issuance.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by Heimerle Refinery Private Limited challenging communications from the customs authorities regarding the import of goods. The core issue was whether the imported goods, which arrived in India before the publication of Notification No.02/2026-27, were subject to the restrictions imposed by the notification. The petitioner argued that the goods had arrived before the notification's publication and thus should not be restricted. The court noted that the goods were dispatched from the country of export and arrived in India on 1st and 2nd April 2026, prior to the notification's publication on 2nd April 2026. The court granted interim relief on 5th May 2026, allowing the release of certain consignments upon the furnishing of bonds. The respondents contended that the restriction applied to goods pending clearance, asserting that the date of import under the Customs Act was relevant. The court analyzed various precedents, particularly focusing on the decisions in Enero Jewels Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Bright Metal Refiners, which supported the petitioner's position. Ultimately, the court held that the notification could not apply retrospectively to goods that had already arrived in India, thereby allowing the petitioner to clear the goods without restriction.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Applicability of Notification - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court examined whether the notification restricting imports applied to goods that arrived before its publication. It held that the notification could not retrospectively affect goods that had already arrived in India prior to its issuance, thus allowing the petitioner's goods to be cleared (Paras 1-27).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the imported goods which arrived in India before the publication of Notification No.02/2026-27 are covered under the said notification.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court held that the notification could not apply retrospectively to goods that had already arrived in India prior to its publication, thus allowing the petitioner to clear the goods without restriction.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act
  • 1992
  • Customs Act
  • 1962
  • Foreign Trade Policy
  • 2023
  • Notification No.02/2026-27
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 12

Writ Petition No.3274 of 2026

2026-10-19

M. S. Karnik, San Desh D. Patil

Mr. Prakash Shah, Adv. Jas Sanghavi, Adv. Linzy Sharan, Adv. Maya Majumdar, Adv. Abhishek R. Mishra, Adv. Jitendra B. Mishra, Adv. Ashutosh Misra

Heimerle Refinery Private Limited

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging customs notification regarding import restrictions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought clearance of imported goods without restrictions.

Filing Reason

Dispute over applicability of import restrictions to goods arrived before notification.

Previous Decisions

Court had previously granted interim relief allowing partial clearance of goods.

Issues

Applicability of import restrictions to goods arrived before notification Date of import for determining restrictions under FTP

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that goods arrived before the notification and should not be restricted. Respondents contended that the date of filing bills of entry is relevant for applying restrictions.

Ratio Decidendi

The notification restricting imports cannot apply to goods that arrived in India before its publication, as the date of import is determined by the arrival of goods, not by the filing of bills of entry.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue involved in this writ petition is whether the imported goods which arrive within the territorial jurisdiction of India before the Notification No.02/2026-27 was published shall be covered under the said notification. The court held that the notification acquired the force of law only on 2nd April 2026 at 20:52:58 hours, and it can be validly applied only to the goods dispatched from the country of export after its publication.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed challenging communications from customs authorities regarding import restrictions. Interim relief was granted on 5th May 2026 for partial clearance of goods. The matter was subsequently taken to the Supreme Court, which directed the High Court to decide the writ petition on its merits.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992: Sections 3, 5
  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 15
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case — Rear Courtyard Not Part of Built-Up Area for Section 80-IB(10) Computation. The court held that the Tribunal cannot inquire into matters beyond the lis between the parties...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Send Cheques for Handwriting Expert Opinion in Section 138 NI Act Case — Trial Court's Rejection of Section 45 Evidence Act Application Set Aside. The court held that when the accused denies his signature ...