High Court of Bombay Allows Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation Due to Inaction by Authorities. Reservation Lapsed as Authorities Failed to Act on Valid Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the legal heirs of Shrikant Devidas Uplekar, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare that the reservation of their land for a primary school and playground had lapsed. The petitioners contended that the land had been reserved for over ten years without acquisition by the Malegaon Municipal Corporation, prompting them to issue a Purchase Notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The petitioners argued that despite serving the notice, the Corporation failed to initiate acquisition proceedings. The Corporation countered that the notice was incomplete as it lacked certain documents. The court analyzed the requirements of Section 127 and determined that the petitioners had indeed provided the necessary documentation, including the 7/12 extract proving ownership. The court found that the Corporation's demand for additional documents was an attempt to delay the process and ruled that the reservation had lapsed due to the Corporation's inaction. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, affirming the petitioners' right to develop the land as per the Development Plan. The ruling emphasized the importance of timely action by authorities in response to valid Purchase Notices under the MRTP Act.

Headnote

A) Land Use - Lapsing of Reservation - Validity of Purchase Notice - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Section 127 - The court held that the petitioners complied with the statutory requirements of Section 127 by issuing a valid Purchase Notice, which included the necessary documents, and since the authorities did not take steps for acquisition within the stipulated time, the reservation lapsed. The petitioners were thus entitled to develop the land as per the Development Plan (Paras 20-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of the land has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court held that the petitioners complied with the provisions of Section 127 of the MRTP Act, and since the Corporation did not take any steps for acquisition, the reservation lapsed. The petition was allowed, and the petitioners were permitted to develop the land.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • lapsing of reservations
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • Section 127
  • statutory compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 2

WP-4596-2024

2026-10-22

Sande sh D. Patil, M. S. Karnik

Mr. Vinit P. Ahuja, Mr. Prakash Ahuja, Mr. S.S. Patwardhan, Mr. A.V. Hardas, Smt. Reena A. Salunkhe

Shrikant Devidas Uplekar, A. Aruna Shrikant Uplekar, Amruta Shrikant Uplekar

Malegaon Municipal Corporation, The Commissioner, Malegaon Municipal Corporation, The Collector, Nashik, Assistant Director of Town Planning, The Director, Town Planning, The Deputy Director, Town Planning, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration of lapsing of land reservation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a Writ of Mandamus to declare the reservation lapsed.

Filing Reason

Reservation for primary school and playground not acted upon for over 10 years.

Issues

Whether the reservation of the land has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Whether the Purchase Notice issued by the petitioners was valid and complete.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the reservation had lapsed due to inaction by the Corporation after serving the Purchase Notice. Respondent Corporation contended that the Purchase Notice was incomplete and required additional documents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that a valid Purchase Notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, accompanied by proof of ownership, is sufficient for the lapsing of land reservation if the authorities fail to act within the stipulated time.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are seeking a Writ of Mandamus, thereby directing that the reservation of the plot Nos.24 to 38... is deemed to have lapsed. The petitioners had issued notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act upon the respondent No.1 - Corporation on 13 th February 2020. The reservation on the said land bearing Plot Nos.24 to 38... has lapsed.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed seeking a declaration of lapsing of land reservation. The petitioners issued a Purchase Notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, which was not acted upon by the Corporation. The court heard the arguments and ruled in favor of the petitioners.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Eviction Order in Rent Control Dispute — High Court's Reversal Found Erroneous. Citing substantial evidence, the Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's eviction order under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Matter Holding Interlocutory Order Not Appealable. Rejection of Commission for Inspection Deemed Procedural Order Not Affecting Rights or Liabilities Under Section 38(1) of Delhi Rent Control Ac...