Supreme Court Modifies Custody Order in Child Custody Dispute — Upholds Child's Welfare. The court determined that the child's welfare was paramount, and custody should remain with the father due to the child's expressed wishes and established living situation.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a custody dispute concerning a child born from the marriage of the parties, which was solemnized on 16.05.2010. The child, Manish, was born on 18.02.2011, and following matrimonial disputes, the appellant filed for divorce in 2014. The respondent sought maintenance and interim custody, which was granted by the Magistrate on 22.05.2014. The appellant's subsequent applications to revoke this order were dismissed, leading to appeals that were ultimately upheld by the High Court. Despite the lack of a stay, the appellant did not comply with the custody order, and the child remained with him. Mediation efforts were attempted, but the respondent was unwilling to mediate, and the child expressed a desire not to live with the mother. The Supreme Court interacted with the child, who refused to engage with the mother, highlighting the importance of both parents' love and affection for proper growth. The court appointed a senior counsel to facilitate interactions, resulting in the child agreeing to limited contact with the mother. Ultimately, the court decided that it was not in the child's best interest to change custody at this time, allowing for visitation rights for the mother instead. The appeal was disposed of with modifications to the previous order, acknowledging the efforts of the appointed counsel.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Child Custody - Welfare of the Child - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12 - The court emphasized that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in custody disputes. The child, having lived with the father since birth, expressed a strong aversion to living with the mother, leading the court to decide against changing custody at this stage. Held that visitation rights for the mother were to be established (Paras 11-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the custody of the child should be granted to the mother or remain with the father considering the child's welfare.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the previous custody order, allowing the mother visitation rights while retaining custody with the father, considering the child's welfare and expressed wishes.

Law Points

  • Child custody
  • welfare of the child
  • mediation
  • visitation rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (12) 55

Criminal Appeal No. of 2023 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 9914 of 2018)

2023-12-06

Rajesh Bindal, Vikram Nath

2023 INSC 1054

Ms. V. Mohana

Selvaraj

Revathi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding custody of a child born out of wedlock.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to retain custody of the child.

Filing Reason

The respondent filed for maintenance and interim custody.

Previous Decisions

Custody was initially granted to the respondent, but the appellant did not comply with the order.

Issues

Custody of the child Welfare of the child

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for retaining custody based on the child's wishes. The respondent sought custody and visitation rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in custody disputes, and the child's expressed aversion to living with the mother justified the decision to maintain the current custody arrangement.

Judgment Excerpts

The welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in custody disputes. The child flatly refused not only to go with his mother but even talk to her.

Procedural History

The appellant filed for divorce in 2014, followed by the respondent's complaint for maintenance and custody. The Magistrate granted custody to the respondent in 2014, which was upheld by the District Judge and the High Court. The Supreme Court heard the appeal in 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Rejects Suit for Lack of Cause of Action. The plaint was found to lack any cause of action, leading to its rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.