Supreme Court Allows Home Buyers in Insolvency Case Due to Inclusion as Financial Creditors. Distinction Based on RERA Remedies Found Inequitable Under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, home buyers, challenged a decision by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) regarding their classification as financial creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). They had opted for allotment in a real estate project by Bulland Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. and sought remedies from the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UPRERA) due to delays in project completion. UPRERA ordered refunds with interest, but during insolvency proceedings, a resolution plan differentiated between home buyers based on whether they approached RERA. The appellants argued that this distinction violated their rights as financial creditors under the amended IBC. The court analyzed the definitions of financial creditors and financial debt, concluding that the amendment included home buyers as financial creditors without distinction. The court rejected the Resolution Professional's argument that home buyers who sought remedies under RERA should be treated differently, emphasizing that such treatment was inequitable and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The court set aside the NCLAT's order, declaring the appellants as financial creditors entitled to equal treatment in the resolution plan. The appeal was allowed, and all pending applications were disposed of.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Classification of Creditors - Home Buyers as Financial Creditors - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 5(8)(f) - The court held that home buyers who obtained a decree from RERA are to be treated as financial creditors under the IBC, as the amendment in 2018 included them in the definition of financial creditors. The distinction made by the Resolution Professional was found to be inequitable and contrary to the provisions of the IBC (Paras 6-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether home buyers who have obtained a decree from RERA can be classified as financial creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the NCLAT's order, declaring the appellants as financial creditors under Section 5(8)(f) of the IBC and entitled to equal treatment in the resolution plan.

Law Points

  • financial creditors
  • financial debt
  • real estate
  • RERA
  • insolvency
  • discrimination
  • home buyers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (10) 164

Civil Appeal No. 3806 of 2023

2023-10-06

S. Ravindra Bhat, Aravind Kumar

Abhimanyu Bhandari, Nattasha Garg, Thakur Ankit Singh, Varun M., Shristy Singh, Rooh-e-hina Dua, Gunjesh Ranjan, Sidharth Sarthi, Anil Kumar, Shantanu Sagar, Prabhat R. Raj

Vishal Chelani & Ors.

Debashis Nanda

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the decision of NCLAT regarding classification of home buyers as financial creditors.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought recognition as financial creditors under the IBC.

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the NCLAT's ruling that treated them differently from other home buyers.

Previous Decisions

NCLAT upheld the Resolution Professional's classification of home buyers.

Issues

Classification of home buyers as financial creditors Distinction based on remedies sought under RERA

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued for equal treatment as financial creditors under IBC. Resolution Professional contended that appellants relinquished rights under RERA.

Ratio Decidendi

Home buyers with decrees from RERA are classified as financial creditors under the IBC, and any distinction based on their choice of remedies is inequitable and unconstitutional.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants challenge a decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The court held that home buyers who obtained a decree from RERA are to be treated as financial creditors under the IBC. The distinction made by the Resolution Professional was found to be inequitable.

Procedural History

The appellants approached NCLAT after their applications were rejected by the adjudicating authority during insolvency proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 5(8)(f), 7(1), 238
  • Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016: 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Implead Legal Representatives in Specific Performance Suit. Order 22 Rule 4A CPC mandates impleadment of legal representatives of deceased defendant in a suit for sp...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Desertion-Based Divorce Decree, Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent Under Article 142 of Constitution of India, Awards Permanent Alimony in Hindu Marriage Act Case