Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Inconsistencies in Testimony. The prosecution failed to prove the common object necessary for conviction under Section 149 IPC.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals against the conviction of several accused for the murder of Ajay under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. The incident occurred on 22-04-2016, when Ajay was shot while being chased by assailants on motorcycles. The prosecution's case relied heavily on the testimony of Mohit @ Kala (PW-9), who claimed to have witnessed the incident. However, the court found significant inconsistencies in PW-9's statements, including his failure to name the accused in his initial report and discrepancies regarding the number of motorcycles involved. The court noted that the prosecution did not conduct a Test Identification Parade (TIP) and that the CCTV footage presented was not reliable, as it did not clearly identify the accused. The court emphasized that the prosecution failed to prove a common object among the accused necessary for a conviction under Section 149 IPC. Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the convictions, and acquitted the accused, highlighting the deficiencies in the prosecution's case and the lack of credible evidence linking the accused to the crime.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Conviction under Section 302 IPC - Insufficient Evidence - The prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witness's testimony was inconsistent and lacked corroboration. The court found that the prosecution did not prove the common object necessary for conviction under Section 149 IPC. The appeals were allowed, and the accused were acquitted. - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 149 (Paras 10-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the judgments of the Sessions Court and the High Court, and acquitted the accused of all charges, ordering their immediate release if not required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 149 IPC
  • Section 25 Evidence Act
  • Section 26 Evidence Act
  • Section 65B Evidence Act
  • Section 313 Cr.P.C.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (10) 152

Criminal Appeal No.1786 of 2023

2023-10-09

Aravind Kumar, S. Ravindra Bhat

Siddharth Mittal, Vikas Walia, Manisha Aggarwal Narain

Naresh @ Nehru, Irshad, Sonu Kumar

State of Haryana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder.

Remedy Sought

Accused sought acquittal from the conviction.

Filing Reason

Appeals filed against the judgment of the High Court affirming conviction.

Previous Decisions

Conviction by the Sessions Court was affirmed by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the testimony of the key witness was reliable.

Submissions/Arguments

The trial court and High Court erred in convicting the appellant without proper consideration of the evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a common object necessary for conviction under Section 149 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, particularly the common object necessary for conviction under Section 149 IPC, and the inconsistencies in the key witness's testimony undermined the prosecution's case.

Judgment Excerpts

The prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The testimony of PW-9 was shrouded with inconsistencies and he had not named the appellants in the FIR.

Procedural History

The accused were convicted by the Sessions Court on 06-10-2017, and the conviction was affirmed by the High Court on 09-01-2020, leading to the present appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 149
  • Evidence Act, 1872: 25, 26, 65B
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Part-Time Librarian's Pension Claim by Counting Part-Time Service as Qualifying Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court held that part-time service rendered by the petitioner is liable to be ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order on Pay Scale Parity for Employees. The High Court's ruling was upheld as it recognized historical parity and the need for equal treatment under the Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations.