Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Divorce Case with Financial Settlement. Court Dissolves Marriage on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown and Orders Maintenance Payment.

In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal concerning the dissolution of marriage between Nikesh Kumar and Suman Devi. The marriage took place on 08.12.2004, but the couple began living separately by 10.11.2005, leading to a divorce petition filed by Nikesh on 15.09.2006, which was granted by the Family Court on 09.08.2012. Suman Devi appealed against this decree, resulting in the High Court of Jharkhand setting aside the divorce. The Supreme Court, referencing its earlier judgment in Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, evaluated the irretrievable breakdown of marriage based on several factors, including the duration of separation and attempts at reconciliation. The Court found that the couple had been separated for over 17 years and had not cohabited since November 2005, concluding that the marriage had completely failed. The Court exercised its powers under Article 142(1) of the Constitution to dissolve the marriage, stating that the continuation of the legal relationship was unjustified. Additionally, the Court facilitated a financial settlement where Nikesh agreed to pay Suman Rs.40,00,000/- in total, with specific installment terms, and directed the execution of a gift deed for a property registered in Suman's name. The appeal was allowed, and all related claims were to be disposed of upon payment.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage - Grounds for Divorce - Article 142(1) Constitution of India - Court exercised its power to dissolve the marriage due to the irretrievable breakdown, considering the long period of separation and lack of possibility for reconciliation. Held that continuation of the marriage was unjustified (Paras 1-3).

B) Family Law - Financial Settlement - Maintenance and Property Transfer - Court ordered the appellant to pay a total of Rs.40,00,000/- as maintenance, with specific payment terms, and directed the execution of a gift deed for property transfer. Held that all claims related to maintenance would be disposed of upon payment (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the marriage between the appellant and respondent should be dissolved on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, dissolved the marriage between Nikesh Kumar and Suman Devi on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown, and ordered a financial settlement of Rs.40,00,000/- to be paid by the appellant in installments, along with the execution of a gift deed for property transfer.

Law Points

  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • Article 142(1) Constitution of India
  • factors for divorce
  • maintenance settlement
  • gift deed execution
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (10) 110

Civil Appeal No. of 2023 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 28145 OF 2018)

2023-10-20

Sanjiv Khanna, S.V.N. Bhatti

2023 INSC 961

Nikesh Kumar

Suman Devi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's decision to set aside a divorce decree.

Remedy Sought

Nikesh Kumar sought to uphold the divorce decree.

Filing Reason

The respondent appealed against the divorce granted on grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Previous Decisions

The Family Court had granted a decree for divorce which was later set aside by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the marriage should be dissolved on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown What financial settlement should be ordered upon dissolution of marriage

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the validity of the divorce decree based on long separation and lack of cohabitation. The respondent contested the divorce, leading to the appeal in the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage justified the dissolution of the marriage under Article 142(1) of the Constitution, emphasizing the long period of separation and absence of reconciliation efforts.

Judgment Excerpts

The marriage has completely failed and there is no possibility that the parties will reunite or cohabit together. The appellant has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- to the respondent, in addition to the amount of Rs.15,00,000/- which the appellant has already paid.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a petition for divorce, which was granted by the Family Court. The respondent appealed against this decree, leading to the High Court setting aside the divorce, which prompted the current appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 142(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Challenge to KAT Order Directing Regularisation of Daily Wage Employee. Continuous Service of 240 Days in a Calendar Year Confers Right to Regularisation Under Karnataka Daily Wage Employees (Regularisatio...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Registration of Sale Deed Based on Unregistered Will — Registration Act, 1908 Sections 17 and 49 Bar Unregistered Will from Affecting Immovable Property Rights. The court held that an unre...